« Reply #48 on: October 30, 2024, 08:44:33 pm »
I surmise that my first outing with the shirt may have played a part in one of these decisions:
2240406384
(Not even allowed to sit at the bench)
2240418124 not even mentioned.
2240417904 these were completely re-arranged and were supposed to be consolidated for a hearing in November.
Never a dull moment in this game.
« Last Edit: October 30, 2024, 08:47:07 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.
"Hippocrates"
ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ