Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
Post up the PCN - this sounds like a council issued notice?
22
Private parking tickets / Re: PCN from 'Civil Enforcement Ltd'
« Last post by Mustek on Today at 09:07:04 am »
@badrav Your MCOL password is left unredacted in page 2. Please redact it or otherwise someone else could file a response on your behalf.
23
The deadline to respond is 14 days after 5 days after the date on the form, after that the claimant can apply for a judgment in default against you.
If you haven’t already got this, submit the acknowledgment of service immediately.
24
I managed to get one of them refunded definately better than nothing so always worth a try!
25
Sorry the website I was using to send attachments stopped working so figuring out another way.

Stupid me for beleving a wealthy family I went to work for. Awful road diversion so was an hour late, asked about off road parking they said it wss fine or they had a garage they could clear. Every road was residential so had to park, I assumed as they had a permit I could use it if I proved I was working. This is Kensington when I got home apparentlty they dont issue visitor permits. Why? How do you park there then.

Anyway to fight my way out?
26
Should I ignore the letter and let it go to court, or should I fill out the part where it says i want to contest this matter. I wont end up paying more of a fine if I end up ignoring the letter will I?
27
As others have said, drag this process out as much as possible.


Is there any chance that the vehicle is subject to a finance agreement? I ask because if that were true, the 'owner' would be a finance company - that would mess them up!


I'd defiantly appeal as this will give you further access to the POPLA appeal process which will further consume a period of time.

Also, personal experience tells me that POPLA are unlikely to agree with the operators statement regarding 'reasonable assumption' with regard to keeper liability - the fact is, there is no legal mechanism which can move liability from the owner to the keeper. If liability could be shifted from party to party so easily then there would be no need for the processes set out in PoFA. The fact that PoFA exists clearly demonstrates that the law requires something greater than 'reasonable assumption' when moving liability to the keeper. The operator's claim of reasonable assumption is being made out of necessity rather than any proven legal process. VCS v Edward also confirms the legal position of reasonable assumption with regard to keeper liability.
28
You obviously submitted a strong appeal - this is evidenced by their failure to engage with any points raised.

You now have a choice - I personally recommend going down the IAS route as it shows that you are willing to engage / resolve the issue.

Could you post the content of your original appeal?
30
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nXr7GgXtEfglXh0D5-BqimFoC8Ly5krB/view?usp=share_link

Please let me if you can access the PDF file through the above link

Regards,
Ashraf

Yes - very clear - BUT

it shows yr namr & address long enough to read before the overlying redaction appears. You may wish to actually cover the name & address with a small piece of paper qmd then rescan or photo before re-uploading.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10