Author Topic: Exploring an idea to make PCN appeals easier using tech, would love your thoughts  (Read 3616 times)

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hi all,

I have been reading through the posts here and it is clear how much time and knowledge goes into challenging PCNs. The advice shared is great, but most drivers never get this far. They just pay up, even when they may have grounds to appeal, because it feels like too much hassle.

I am part of a small team of software developers and we have been exploring whether there could be a simple way to guide people through an appeal, prepare everything properly, and submit it on their behalf. The service would be designed to make it super easy to appeal and would run on a no-win, no-fee basis. We have also mapped out how AI could help structure the challenges, but the focus would be keeping it straightforward for drivers.

I want to be clear, I am not here to sell anything. We have not built anything yet. Right now I am just trying to understand whether this is a service that drivers would actually value, or whether you feel most people are better off doing it themselves with the right advice.

I am not here to sell anything, just curious:
   •   Do you think ordinary motorists would use this?
   •   What are the biggest barriers that stop people from appealing now?
   •   Any pitfalls we should be aware of?

Thanks for any honest feedback.

Callum

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Is the idea to make it easier to appeal PCNs, or is it to get AI to generate a sketchy app, feed it by stealing our content, get someone else to fund it, make money using the AI's "understanding" of stolen content, and get us to provide consultancy services for free to assist you in your venture?

And altruistically don't charge clients who you end up costing money when your AI gets it wrong.
I am responsible for the accuracy of the information I post, not your ability to comprehend it.

As a preliminary matter, it isn't clear whether your proposed service is to support with council Penalty Charge Notices, private Parking Charge Notices, or both.

The first thought that came to my mind, is that I'm not entirely sure to what extent your service would solve what you suggest is the problem. Your premise is that too many motorists simply pay up without a fight (which I'd agree with), because it is "too much hassle" (which is presumably true for some, but who knows how many).

In many cases, both private and council, an appellant who wishes to challenge his 'ticket' must be prepared to fight it all the way, either to the tribunal in the case of council tickets, or to the County Court in the case of private parking charges. Will your service offer in person representation for users at court and/or tribunals? If not, then I'm struggling to see what "hassle" you would be saving people, that this forum is not already saving them for free.


The concern with "AI" is that not every case is straightforward.

Whilst a system to try and get all the required info from users and format it into a standardised report would work, I'm not sure AI can help here, especially if it were to start hallucinating and costing people money.


Personally I have no faith or trust in anything produced by AI. Much the same as I have little faith in some of the numpties employed by local authorities who dish out PCNs like confetti.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2025, 09:21:03 am by roythebus »
Bus driving since 1973. My advice, if you have a PSV licence, destroy it when you get to 65 or you'll be forever in demand.

Thank you to the above who kindly replied.

Just to be clear, we are not here "stealing content", and we don't need anyone to fund this.

The target initially would be PCN, moving onto private tickets later.

I should have been clearer on the idea and the problem it solves.

This would be a chat interface (based on WhatsApp) whereby a user can snap a photo of a ticket, get instant guidance on what evidence to collect on the spot, and the AI would ask questions to analyse, firstly if there is a potential appeal, followed by the ability to collate the evidence and submit to a council, all without leaving whattsapp and completed in probably less than 3 minutes.

On the backend, a human would check every submission before it goes to a council.   

So the idea is, this is about speed and convenience on a no-win/no-fee basis.

I completely understand the scepticism currently around AI, but the future is here I'm afraid. We have built much more complex solutions than this, so whether it can be done is not the question. The real question is, is this worth building? Is there an appetite for such a service?

Many thanks for any replies again, I'm not here to offend or sell you anything. Just looking for some expert opinions on the matter.


Is there an appetite for such a service?
This might not be the best forum to ask this question - if someone has made it to this forum, they are more likely to be suitably determined to put in the work required to challenge the ticket with our help, rather than needing someone to do it for them. Although thinking logically, given there are a high proportion of people who are prepared to part with £45-70 right off the bat to make a PCN go away, one would imagine at least some of those would be prepared to pay a sum less than that to make it go away, if there was a good prospect of success.

Although that takes me back to my initial point, that a fair number of successful cases are only successful after reaching the tribunal. I am assuming that your service will not be representing people at tribunal hearings, as you have not indicated otherwise. If that is the case I feel like there's the potential for quite a lot of unhappy customers, who use your service to challenge their PCNs without the hassle, and then find themselves facing the choice of paying the full PCN amount, with the discount being off the table, or enduring significantly increased hassle in the form of a tribunal.

The OP has ostensibly sought our advice on the viability of a scheme (?sp) without giving any meaningful indication of what it is intended to achieve, or where the expertise/knowledge would be coming from.

The only parts of the scheme that are apparent are

something, something
AI
profit
I am responsible for the accuracy of the information I post, not your ability to comprehend it.

Thank you for the input once again. You are right, this is definitely not the place to be pitching this potential idea. The tone feels very defensive all around.

Andy, all the best with the trolling.

Dislike Dislike x 1 View List

The tone feels very defensive all around.
With respect, you've signed up to a forum that (in this guise and as its predecessor) has been offering free advice to motorists for over 20 years, to ask for input on a service that would seek to make a private profit for attempting to use AI to do broadly the same thing - I think a certain level of scepticism is both expected and healthy.

There have been plenty of services crop up over the years offering to make PCNs go away for a "small fee" - many of their customers have subsequently ended up turning to forums like this, when their appeals failed and it became clear that the private appeals service's support didn't extend to tribunal/court representation.

If people want to pay someone else to send their appeals for them, fine. My main issue with paid for appeals services is that they seldom offer support at the tribunal/court stage, which is generally where a layman would most require it.


I completely get it.

Thank you for your input and thoughts.

Unfortunately, AI does not yet have the capability to attend a tribunal... Yet  ;D




I completely understand the scepticism currently around AI, but the future is here I'm afraid. We have built much more complex solutions than this, so whether it can be done is not the question. The real question is, is this worth building? Is there an appetite for such a service?

Many thanks for any replies again, I'm not here to offend or sell you anything. Just looking for some expert opinions on the matter.

OP. would you care to give us details of the "much more complex solutions" you have built?

Are these in commercial use? If so, any customer references?

Much the same as I have little faith in some of the numpties employed by local authorities who dish out PCNs like confetti.
I agree. One exception being bogsy from Pepipoo. He helped me out when I first sought help. He was a bit reluctant to talk about himself but told me he worked his way up to be quite high up in local authority traffic control. He said he was an appeals officer for a while and it was the misfeasance and double standard of councils that made him rebel. I've not seen him on here. Last I heard was a year ago and he was terminally ill.