« Reply #9 on: September 03, 2024, 09:45:48 pm »
Thank you
So just to make sure I have this correct:
First link is the suggested text for online appeal where I need to include my PCN/Reg and the web code.
The 2nd link is the tribunal appeal decision in case I have to go to appeal
Do we know this is the same camera as that case from the video or can we not be 100% sure.
And presumably there is a chance they could now have the cert or is that unlikely too?
Thank you again
Use the first link. I have done a FOIR re the camera - no need to mention this at this stage as they should reply to the issue raised. Keep us posted please.
TES small blue is the camera - about as helpful as a hole in a pint glass.
« Last Edit: September 04, 2024, 09:16:46 am by Hippocrates »
Logged
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.
"Hippocrates"
ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ
