« Reply #21 on: September 19, 2024, 01:40:45 pm »
I meant this:
https://imgur.com/Fy1WEBcIf you would like me to represent you please drop me a PM. They may well DNC of course as they are legislatively-challenged, if that is a phrase!
Our usual advice: personal hearing, I rely upon my formal representations and will file full submissions upon receipt of the council's evidence pack. Not a Thursday, preferably Mon to Wed.
« Last Edit: September 19, 2024, 01:42:36 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.
"Hippocrates"
ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ
