@thepcnguy from a quick look at least some of the information provided is outright wrong, so I'd suggest you want to put a big banner at the top stating this is tool is in beta testing and should not be relied upon by anyone for any purpose, and nobody should challenge a PCN based on the information it generates.
That's not to say that it doesn't have potential, but some of the information given would actually harm the motorist's chances on appeal. I do not (and will not) have the time to go through every possible scenario and permutation for you, and the other problem is that it would need to be constantly maintained: tactics change all the time as councils change their processes and policies, find new ways to mess things up, the tribunal jurisprudence eveloes and so on.
Ultimately I very much doubt you'll be able to tell anyone that they can actually rely on the tool, it might eventually get to the point where it can create a good starting point, but I think you'll always need a qualified person to review the outputs. It might be helpful if it could do something similar to what the NIP wizard used to do on Pepipoo, i.e. gather all the information for a post on this site and then give us a concise summary of the key stuff we need to know to be able to give proper advice.
