Author Topic: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.  (Read 5587 times)

0 Members and 50 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #30 on: »
Send a complaint to the DVLA. Here’s how to make a DVLA complaint:

• Go to: https://contact.dvla.gov.uk/complaints
• Select: “Making a complaint or compliment about the Vehicles service you have received”
• Enter your personal details, contact details, and vehicle details
• Use the text box to summarise your complaint or insert a covering note
• You will then be able to upload a file (up to 19.5 MB) — this can be your full complaint or supporting evidence
That’s it.

The DVLA is required to record, investigate and respond to every complaint about a private parking company. If everyone who encounters a breach took the time to submit a complaint, we might finally see the DVLA take meaningful action—whether that means curtailing or removing KADOE access altogether.

For the text part of the complaint the webform could use the following:

Quote
I am submitting a formal complaint against Parking Control Solutions Ltd (Company No. 08419177), who purport to be an IPC AOS member with DVLA KADOE access. They do not appear on the IPC’s publicly-published list of AOS members, and every enquiry to ipc@theipc.info elicits only an automated, non-responsive boilerplate.

Because they are not a current IPC-accredited operator, they have no legitimate contract with the DVLA to access keeper data. Their issuance of a PCN to me, the registered keeper, using DVLA-supplied data therefore amounts to unauthorised data access and misuse.

Furthermore, the IPC itself—acting as the Accredited Trade Association—has failed in its duty to maintain an accurate public register and to respond to reasonable requests for confirmation of membership.

Under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018, the DVLA, as Data Controller, is obliged to investigate any misuse of keeper data and the conduct of both data recipients and the ATA that governs them. I therefore request:

• A full investigation into Parking Control Solutions Ltd’s unlawful access and use of my personal data.
• An inquiry into the IPC’s failure to fulfil its ATA obligations.
• Appropriate enforcement action or sanctions against both PCS Ltd and the IPC, up to suspension or termination of KADOE access.

Please acknowledge receipt of this complaint and provide me with a reference number.

Then you could upload the following as a PDF file for the formal complaint itself:

Quote
SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Complaint to DVLA – Unauthorised Access to Keeper Data & ATA Failure

Operator name: Parking Control Solutions Ltd (Company No. 08419177)
Date of PCN issue: [INSERT DATE]
Vehicle registration: [INSERT VRM]

1. Introduction

I submit this complaint to the DVLA regarding the conduct of Parking Control Solutions Ltd (“PCS Ltd”) in relation to their access and use of my personal keeper data, and the failure of the International Parking Community (“IPC”), as the Accredited Trade Association (ATA), to uphold its duties. PCS Ltd obtained my DVLA-supplied data purportedly under the Keeper At Date Of Event (KADOE) scheme, but as they are not listed on the IPC’s official AOS register, they hold no valid contract with the DVLA. This amounts to unauthorised data access. Moreover, the IPC has repeatedly refused to confirm or deny PCS Ltd’s accreditation status, responding only with automated, non-responsive boilerplate, thereby breaching its own obligations as regulator of the sector.

2. Unauthorised Access and Misuse of DVLA Data

Lack of KADOE Entitlement

PCS Ltd is absent from the IPC’s publicly-published list of Accredited Operator Scheme (AOS) members (see screenshot attached). Only AOS members may lawfully request keeper data under KADOE. By requesting—and using—my personal data without any such accreditation, PCS Ltd acted entirely outside the scope of the DVLA’s KADOE contract.

Misuse of Personal Data

PCS Ltd subsequently issued a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) to me, the registered keeper, on [INSERT DATE]. This use of my data was neither authorised (no valid KADOE contract) nor compliant with the Private Parking Single Code of Practice (PPSCoP), to which all accredited operators must adhere. Even if a KADOE request had been lawful, any misuse thereafter (misleading notices and refusal to engage) would breach the PPSCoP’s requirements for fair and transparent pursuit of charges.

3. Failure of the IPC as Accredited Trade Association

The IPC, charged by the DVLA to oversee AOS membership, has materially failed in two respects:

1. Failure to Maintain an Accurate, Public Register

No current mechanism exists for verifying whether PCS Ltd holds accreditation. The publicly-accessible AOS list omits PCS Ltd, yet they continue to claim membership. This undermines public confidence and the integrity of self-regulation.

2. Refusal to Provide Substantive Responses

Every enquiry sent to ipc@theipc.info regarding PCS Ltd’s status has received only an automated, non-responsive reply. The IPC thereby denies stakeholders any transparent means of confirming accreditation, in direct contravention of its ATA duties under the PPSCoP and the DVLA’s governance framework.

4. Legal and Regulatory Framework

Under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018, the DVLA acts as Data Controller for all personal data released under KADOE. It is incumbent upon the DVLA to:

• Investigate any unauthorised or unlawful disclosures of keeper data.
• Enforce the contractual terms of the KADOE scheme, including suspension or termination of access for breaches.
• Ensure that the IPC, as ATA, properly regulates its members and maintains transparent public records.

The actions of PCS Ltd and the inaction of the IPC collectively represent a failure of the DVLA’s governance safeguards and a breach of statutory obligations.

Additionally, the IPC include the DVLA logo on their website pages, which may or may not be authorised. Evidence of this is in the screenshots attached.

5. Requested Remedies

I respectfully request that the DVLA:

• Confirm that PCS Ltd held no valid KADOE contract and therefore accessed my data without authorisation.
• Investigate and sanction PCS Ltd for any misuse of my personal data and breach of the PPSCoP.
• Investigate the IPC’s compliance with its duties as ATA, and require them to maintain an accurate public register and to respond substantively to accreditation enquiries.
• Take enforcement action against both PCS Ltd and/or the IPC as necessary, up to and including suspension or termination of their KADOE access.

Please provide me with a formal acknowledgment of this complaint and a reference number for your records. I am prepared to supply any further information or documentation required to assist your investigation.

6. Attachments

• Screenshot of the IPC AOS members page showing omission of PCS Ltd
• Email correspondence log demonstrating only automated IPC replies
• Copy of the PCN issued by PCS Ltd

Name: [INSERT YOUR NAME]
Date: [INSERT DATE]

In order to obtain the IPC obfuscation response, send the following by email to contact@theipc.info which will generate the response that you can include as an attachment:

Quote
Subject: AOS member query - Parking Control Solutions Ltd

Dear Sirs,

I am enquiring about a private parking operator, Private Control Solutions Ltd, company number: 08419177, that claims to be an AOS member of the IPC. However, they do not appear on your list of AOS members.

Can you please confirm whether this company is a current AOS member of the IPC and from what date they first received accreditation.

I look forward to your response.

Yours faithfully,

[Your name]

You can also include these screenshots showing that PCS do not appear in the list of IPC AOS members:

[img width=1047.5999755859375 height=1701]https://i.imgur.com/Mkrsm0e.jpeg[/img]

[img width=1047.5999755859375 height=1741]https://i.imgur.com/BPC63cu.jpeg[/img]
« Last Edit: June 10, 2025, 02:34:49 pm by b789 »
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #31 on: »
Just to be clear, this should be sent after an invoice is received in the post, I presume?

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #32 on: »
There's a difference between being a member of the IPC, and being an Accredited Operator Scheme (AOS) Member. The latter is required in order to access keeper data under the KADOE contract.

Unless they have some sort of trading name, I can't see them on the AOS list: https://portal.theipc.info/aos-members/p/?page=1

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #33 on: »
A parking charge has now been received in the mail. Should we go ahead with the complaint above?
« Last Edit: June 13, 2025, 10:44:33 am by Karl »

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #34 on: »
Should we go ahead with the complaint above?
Yes - we were working on the assumption this had been done.

It would be useful to see the notice you have received.

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #35 on: »
Do you know if there is a similar email address for contacting the BPA? They only offer a webform for contact on the website. PCS displays the BPA Approved Member logo on the signage at the parking site as well as printing the IPC logo on the PCN.

I have attached a scan of the NtK.






[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #36 on: »
info@britishparking.co.uk
aos@britishparking.co.uk for complaints
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #37 on: »
Did you submit the DVLA complaint?
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #38 on: »
Yes. Submitted.
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #39 on: »
Just want to confirm, having submitted the complaint to DVLA, there is nothing else we should be doing?

The PCN/NtK has not yet been responded to in any, nor has PCS been contacted for any reason.

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #40 on: »
Did you get any response from the IPC query email I also advised you to send?
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #41 on: »
Yes. Almost immediately. Included it with the DVLA complaint.

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #42 on: »
Reply from DVLA:

Quote
Thank you for your correspondence of 13th of June about the release of information
from the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency’s (DVLA) vehicle register. I have been
asked to formally review your case at Step 1 of our complaint’s procedure.
The DVLA takes the protection and security of its data very seriously and has
procedures in place to ensure data is disclosed only where it is lawful and fair to do
so and where the provisions of the Data Protection Law are met. The Agency must
strike a balance between ensuring the privacy of motorists is respected while
enabling those who may have suffered loss or damage to seek redress.
The Government’s policy is that parking operators must be a member of an
Accredited Trade Association (ATA) to receive DVLA data and DVLA will not
disclose data to parking companies who are not members of an ATA and looks
primarily to the ATA’s to monitor adherence to the code of practice and explore and
address non-compliance when it arises. The ATA makes stringent checks before
parking management companies can join. If a company fails to comply with the
relevant code of practice, it can be suspended or expelled, during which time no data
will be provided to it by the DVLA.
The company in question, Parking Control Solution Ltd is a member of the
International Parking Community Ltd (IPC) which is an ATA for the parking industry.
The IPC’s code of practice is published on its website at www.theipc.info under the
heading Accredited Operators Scheme. If a member of this AOS does not comply
with the code of practice, it may be suspended or expelled, during which time no
data will be provided to it by the DVLA. If you feel that any of the practices used by
the company do not comply with the IPC’s code of practice, you may wish to contact
the IPC via their website or by writing to IPC, at PO Box 662 SK10 9NR.
We have fully considered all the information available. If you feel that your
complaint has not been resolved, you can request escalation of your complaint to
Step 2 of the complaints process. Further options about our complaint procedure
can be found online at www.gov.uk/dvla/complaints.


I note frustratingly here that while the letter states that PCS is a member of IPC, it does not call it an accredited member, despite later referring to the Accredited Operator Scheme.

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #43 on: »
You never showed us the response from the IPC that you supposedly received "almost immediately"!

I am still waiting for the FoI request I made with the DVLA about this company. I note that they do now appeal on the IPC list of AoS members.

Before and after images of the list of AOS members:



Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Parking ticket on office premises, ticket lost.
« Reply #44 on: »
Oh, given that you said to send an email to generate the boilerplate automatic response, I presumed it would be exactly that and that you would already know what it said. Apologies. Here is what I got from the IPC:

Quote
Dear Sir or Madam
 
Please note, messages sent to this email address will not be responded to.
 
Appeal:  If you are trying to appeal a parking charge that has been issued to you by a parking operator that is a member of the International Parking Community (IPC), you must first appeal to the parking operator. The details of the appeals process will be detailed on the notice you will have received.
If they reject your appeal they will give you the ability to appeal to the Independent Appeals Service (IAS). Once you have been given that ability then you will only have 28 days to lodge the appeal.
Appeals can be lodged online at www.theias.org  You will need the Parking charge number and the vehicle registration number.
 
Complaint: If you believe that a member of the IPC has breached the Sector Code of Practice, you are able to submit a complaint. You must first submit your complaint to the parking operator, the details of this process will be detailed on any notice you will have received and will be documented on their website if applicable.
Should you remain dissatisfied with their response, you may escalate your complaint to the IPC via the online portal: portal.theipc.info/login/complaints
 
Assistance: If you need to enquire about the process of appealing a parking charge then you can visit www.theias.org  where you will find helpful information. If your enquiry is more complicated you will be able to lodge an enquiry by using the contact us tab, registering your details and sending your enquiry through the online portal. www.theias.org/contact-us
 
If you want to know whether you should have the opportunity to appeal a charge, please check the flowchart at www.theias.org
           
If you are asking about payments of a parking charge, then we are unable to assist you with this matter. You will need to contact the operator who issued the notice.
 
If you want to know if an operator is a member of the International Parking Community, please visit https://portal.theipc.info/aos-members
 
Finally, if your enquiry relates to The private parking sector single Code of Practice, this can be found by using the following link: irp.cdn-website.com/262226a6/files/uploaded/sector_single_Code_of_Practice.pdf
 
We hope you found this information useful
 
Kind Regards
« Last Edit: June 23, 2025, 11:53:07 am by Karl »