Send a complaint to the DVLA. Here’s how to make a DVLA complaint:
• Go to:
https://contact.dvla.gov.uk/complaints• Select: “Making a complaint or compliment about the
Vehicles service you have received”
• Enter your personal details, contact details, and vehicle details
• Use the text box to summarise your complaint or insert a covering note
• You will then be able to upload a file (up to 19.5 MB) — this can be your full complaint or supporting evidence
That’s it.
The DVLA is required to record, investigate and respond to every complaint about a private parking company. If everyone who encounters a breach took the time to submit a complaint, we might finally see the DVLA take meaningful action—whether that means curtailing or removing KADOE access altogether.
For the text part of the complaint the webform could use the following:
I am submitting a formal complaint against Parking Control Solutions Ltd (Company No. 08419177), who purport to be an IPC AOS member with DVLA KADOE access. They do not appear on the IPC’s publicly-published list of AOS members, and every enquiry to ipc@theipc.info elicits only an automated, non-responsive boilerplate.
Because they are not a current IPC-accredited operator, they have no legitimate contract with the DVLA to access keeper data. Their issuance of a PCN to me, the registered keeper, using DVLA-supplied data therefore amounts to unauthorised data access and misuse.
Furthermore, the IPC itself—acting as the Accredited Trade Association—has failed in its duty to maintain an accurate public register and to respond to reasonable requests for confirmation of membership.
Under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018, the DVLA, as Data Controller, is obliged to investigate any misuse of keeper data and the conduct of both data recipients and the ATA that governs them. I therefore request:
• A full investigation into Parking Control Solutions Ltd’s unlawful access and use of my personal data.
• An inquiry into the IPC’s failure to fulfil its ATA obligations.
• Appropriate enforcement action or sanctions against both PCS Ltd and the IPC, up to suspension or termination of KADOE access.
Please acknowledge receipt of this complaint and provide me with a reference number.
Then you could upload the following as a PDF file for the formal complaint itself:
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
Complaint to DVLA – Unauthorised Access to Keeper Data & ATA Failure
Operator name: Parking Control Solutions Ltd (Company No. 08419177)
Date of PCN issue: [INSERT DATE]
Vehicle registration: [INSERT VRM]
1. Introduction
I submit this complaint to the DVLA regarding the conduct of Parking Control Solutions Ltd (“PCS Ltd”) in relation to their access and use of my personal keeper data, and the failure of the International Parking Community (“IPC”), as the Accredited Trade Association (ATA), to uphold its duties. PCS Ltd obtained my DVLA-supplied data purportedly under the Keeper At Date Of Event (KADOE) scheme, but as they are not listed on the IPC’s official AOS register, they hold no valid contract with the DVLA. This amounts to unauthorised data access. Moreover, the IPC has repeatedly refused to confirm or deny PCS Ltd’s accreditation status, responding only with automated, non-responsive boilerplate, thereby breaching its own obligations as regulator of the sector.
2. Unauthorised Access and Misuse of DVLA Data
Lack of KADOE Entitlement
PCS Ltd is absent from the IPC’s publicly-published list of Accredited Operator Scheme (AOS) members (see screenshot attached). Only AOS members may lawfully request keeper data under KADOE. By requesting—and using—my personal data without any such accreditation, PCS Ltd acted entirely outside the scope of the DVLA’s KADOE contract.
Misuse of Personal Data
PCS Ltd subsequently issued a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) to me, the registered keeper, on [INSERT DATE]. This use of my data was neither authorised (no valid KADOE contract) nor compliant with the Private Parking Single Code of Practice (PPSCoP), to which all accredited operators must adhere. Even if a KADOE request had been lawful, any misuse thereafter (misleading notices and refusal to engage) would breach the PPSCoP’s requirements for fair and transparent pursuit of charges.
3. Failure of the IPC as Accredited Trade Association
The IPC, charged by the DVLA to oversee AOS membership, has materially failed in two respects:
1. Failure to Maintain an Accurate, Public Register
No current mechanism exists for verifying whether PCS Ltd holds accreditation. The publicly-accessible AOS list omits PCS Ltd, yet they continue to claim membership. This undermines public confidence and the integrity of self-regulation.
2. Refusal to Provide Substantive Responses
Every enquiry sent to ipc@theipc.info regarding PCS Ltd’s status has received only an automated, non-responsive reply. The IPC thereby denies stakeholders any transparent means of confirming accreditation, in direct contravention of its ATA duties under the PPSCoP and the DVLA’s governance framework.
4. Legal and Regulatory Framework
Under UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018, the DVLA acts as Data Controller for all personal data released under KADOE. It is incumbent upon the DVLA to:
• Investigate any unauthorised or unlawful disclosures of keeper data.
• Enforce the contractual terms of the KADOE scheme, including suspension or termination of access for breaches.
• Ensure that the IPC, as ATA, properly regulates its members and maintains transparent public records.
The actions of PCS Ltd and the inaction of the IPC collectively represent a failure of the DVLA’s governance safeguards and a breach of statutory obligations.
Additionally, the IPC include the DVLA logo on their website pages, which may or may not be authorised. Evidence of this is in the screenshots attached.
5. Requested Remedies
I respectfully request that the DVLA:
• Confirm that PCS Ltd held no valid KADOE contract and therefore accessed my data without authorisation.
• Investigate and sanction PCS Ltd for any misuse of my personal data and breach of the PPSCoP.
• Investigate the IPC’s compliance with its duties as ATA, and require them to maintain an accurate public register and to respond substantively to accreditation enquiries.
• Take enforcement action against both PCS Ltd and/or the IPC as necessary, up to and including suspension or termination of their KADOE access.
Please provide me with a formal acknowledgment of this complaint and a reference number for your records. I am prepared to supply any further information or documentation required to assist your investigation.
6. Attachments
• Screenshot of the IPC AOS members page showing omission of PCS Ltd
• Email correspondence log demonstrating only automated IPC replies
• Copy of the PCN issued by PCS Ltd
Name: [INSERT YOUR NAME]
Date: [INSERT DATE]
In order to obtain the IPC obfuscation response, send the following by email to contact@theipc.info which will generate the response that you can include as an attachment:
Subject: AOS member query - Parking Control Solutions Ltd
Dear Sirs,
I am enquiring about a private parking operator, Private Control Solutions Ltd, company number: 08419177, that claims to be an AOS member of the IPC. However, they do not appear on your list of AOS members.
Can you please confirm whether this company is a current AOS member of the IPC and from what date they first received accreditation.
I look forward to your response.
Yours faithfully,
[Your name]
You can also include these screenshots showing that PCS do not appear in the list of IPC AOS members:
[img width=1047.5999755859375 height=1701]https://i.imgur.com/Mkrsm0e.jpeg[/img]
[img width=1047.5999755859375 height=1741]https://i.imgur.com/BPC63cu.jpeg[/img]