Free Traffic Legal Advice

Any help with this would be greatly appreciated!

The driver overstayed at a G24 managed car park while shopping at Aldi.
Driver sent numerous emails to Aldi asking them to innerve and get the charge cancelled, but they dont want to hear it.

It a genuine case. Driver was inside Aldi the whole time. Driver did 3 trolley loads of shopping and offloaded each one. Long Queues and hahd to do a return of a wrong sized nappy. Showed them all the receipts and bank payments.
Didn't notice the sign until getting the charge by post (https://ibb.co/0j5DRCpP).
They just told the driver to appeal it with G24 directly.
Where as with a similar case, Morrison was happy just to cancel it on behalf of customer.

What should I do?
Appeal to G24?
go to retail ADR
or just pay it?

Yes of course!

I presume, when I submit the form to LT, I just include a quick letter saying my son can deal with the tribunal on my behalf etc.

Also, any chance you can point me to Stamfordman's guide or post on a winning argument at Tribunals please.

TIA

I have 3 main questions please:

- Do I stand a chance with an adjudicator if my main ground is that the PCN's wording states (and also their reply to my representation) that I parked on a Cycle Track, where in fact this is a Cycle Lane. or will an adjudicator just dismiss that and say that what is obviously meant is a cycle lane and you should have known better given the signs.

- They have given me till tomorrow night before it goes up again. I assume I can do the tribunal online, right? as there is no way i can post it in 48 hours.

- the PCN was in my dad's name, but I was the driver. I think when I made the representation, I put his name on the form. So if this goes to tribunal, can I attend, even though my name doesn't appear on the PCN?

I have never been to a tribunal and I don't know how serious it will be. so I am partly think to just pay and get it over and done with.

Thanks in advance to all your help with this!!!

UPDATE:

Hi all,

I made formal representations to Brent on the basis of being parked “wholly or partly on a cycle Lane.” and not "...Cycle Track", along with some additional points about signage and circumstances at the time etc.

They rejected my representations, but notably did not address the cycle track vs cycle lane argument at all in their response — they only responded to the other points.

Given that omission, I’m wondering:
Is this a strong enough ground to take to tribunal?
Does their failure to address that key point work in my favour?
Is this the kind of argument adjudicators are receptive to?

I’m trying to gauge whether I have a realistic chance of success before deciding whether to pay or take it further.

TIA
all your help is much appreciated

Does that  fact that I was 5 minutes till end of enforcement and it was a single yellow line, not allow me to park/stop there briefly.

Dear Sir or Madam,

I make formal representations against Penalty Charge Notice [], issued on 20/01/2026 at 18:25 for contravention code 49J (parked wholly or partly on a cycle track).

Factual background

The location is subject to a cycle lane restriction which operates until 6:30 pm. The alleged contravention occurred at 18:25, five minutes prior to the end of the restriction. The vehicle was stopped only briefly.

At the time, I was travelling with my wife and our 18-month-old baby. My wife suffers from a long-term autoimmune illness and became suddenly unwell and dizzy. In addition, our baby was distressed and crying. Given the immediate welfare and safety concerns, I stopped the vehicle momentarily in order to address the situation. The stop was not for convenience, and the vehicle was not left for any longer than was strictly necessary.

Legal grounds and discretion
I acknowledge the importance of cycle lane enforcement. However, I respectfully submit that this case falls squarely within the circumstances where discretion should be exercised.

Under section 87 of the Traffic Management Act 2004, enforcement authorities are required to have regard to the Secretary of State’s Statutory Guidance to Local Authorities on Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions.

Paragraph 85 of that guidance states:

“Enforcement authorities have a duty to act fairly and proportionately and are encouraged to exercise discretion sensibly and reasonably, with due regard to the public interest.”

Paragraph 86 further provides:

“Authorities should consider mitigating circumstances and should be prepared to exercise discretion where appropriate, even where a contravention has technically occurred.”

This representation is made on that basis. The vehicle was stopped due to an unforeseen medical and childcare situation, very close to the end of the restriction period, and without any intention to contravene parking controls.

Proportionality

I also respectfully draw attention to the principle of proportionality, which underpins civil enforcement. Given:

- the extremely short time remaining before the restriction ended,
- the brief duration of the stop,
- the genuine medical and welfare circumstances involved,

the issue of a penalty charge in these circumstances appears disproportionate to the purpose of the restriction.

Conclusion

In light of the above, I respectfully request that the authority exercise its discretion and cancel the Penalty Charge Notice.

I confirm that I understand and respect parking and traffic restrictions, and this incident was wholly exceptional.

I look forward to your considered response.

PCN Pics


https://ibb.co/ZRpn8Zgq
https://ibb.co/HDYvxdhg
https://ibb.co/PzssqbRd
https://ibb.co/dJrWpWqY