Author Topic: Redbridge - George Lane 31J Stopping in a box junction when prohibited  (Read 529 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Glitch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
Spot on!

What do I need to do with this?

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Karma: +16/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
Spot on!

What do I need to do with this?

I will email you. 
« Last Edit: June 06, 2024, 11:42:08 am by Hippocrates »
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ
Agree Agree x 1 View List

cp8759

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4876
  • Karma: +113/-4
    • View Profile
My heart sank when I saw it was Belinda Pearce. Third time in four appearances I've had her.
She's not refused an appeal of mine for many years now.
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor nor a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Karma: +16/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
Fingers crossed that a hearing will be accepted. IMO her decision clearly states her concerns.
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ

Glitch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
Application for costs accepted. Hearing on 4th July. 😁

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Karma: +16/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
Excellent!  I will email you. If successful, another tattoo?  ;D
« Last Edit: June 14, 2024, 12:12:07 pm by Hippocrates »
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ

Glitch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
Success at the application for costs hearing.

She ruled out frivolous and vexatious and got me to explain why I thought it was 'wholly' unreasonable. Then said that's fine, you're pushing against an open door.

She had invited Redbridge to attend today but they didn't even bother to reply 🙄

Wouldn't allow costs for attending the tribunal but awarded a couple of hours for research.

It wasn't about the money. It's the principle of not allowing Redbridge to get away with their incompetence!
Like Like x 1 Winner Winner x 1 View List

Glitch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
Thanks as always to @cp8759 and especially @Hippocrates for their amazing knowledge, dedication and assistance.

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Karma: +16/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
Well done. I filmed a beautiful sunrise the same day. There is order in the universe.  :)
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ
Like Like x 1 View List

Glitch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
Extract from the costs award:

The threshold of what is "wholly unreasonable," as opposed to "unreasonable," is a high one.

The Enforcement Authority had been cognizant of the Appeal issue from the outset; that issue is one which the Tribunal had been caused to consider in multiple Appeals, the determinations of the Tribunal in such Appeal had been made known to the Enforcement Authority.

I find that the Enforcement Authority's behaviour in its silence throughout the process with regard to the pertinent issue raised by the Tribunal to be negligent in its approach to pursuing the alleged contravention at the very least, or inappropriate in continuing with the case by resisting the Appeal at worst, and thereby amounts to wholly unreasonable behaviour on the part of the Enforcement Authority warranting this award.

I therefore move on to consider quantum: In this respect I have regard to the amount claimed in the Application statement document; attendance at the Tribunal personally is entirely an Appellant's preference, I cannot award costs/expenses for the same.

I do accept the preparatory work claimed at the litigant in person hourly rate.

2 hours at 19 per hour = 38.00

Accordingly, I order that costs be awarded to the Appellant in the sum of 38 payable by the
Enforcement Authority forthwith.

Enough for some 🍻 at the nearest 'Spoons 😁

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Karma: +16/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
I don't know about the attendance issue.
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ

Glitch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
I don't know about the attendance issue.

Seems to be due to the personal attendance being optional - I could have phoned in.


Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Karma: +16/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
Well I obtained costs vis a vis attendance for at least one appellant.
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ

Glitch

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile

I'm not going to make a fuss whilst I have Ms Pearce onside  ;D

Just had the Redbridge 'Parking Technician' on the phone asking me to send bank statement for them to make payment.
Didn't realise during the call that it was the same person that signed their witness statement for the Tribunal.

Not even a hint of apology on the call or subsequent email. Best not to let rip at the incompetent little toe rag.  :-X

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1261
  • Karma: +16/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
How many tattoos?
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ