Unfortunately, I no longer have a copy of my further representations because they were submitted directly through the TfL portal and the acknowledgement email did not include the text. I copied the representation into the portal at the time and, to the best of my recollection, it read substantially as follows:
I am challenging the Charge Certificate because I was unaware that my representation had been rejected and was deprived of my opportunity to appeal.
I submitted representations on 14 April 2026 and subsequently requested CCTV footage. I actively monitored the progress of the case through the TfL online portal.
I did not receive any Notice of Rejection by post and I did not receive any email advising that my representation had been rejected. My address has been correct throughout and I have not moved.
The online case history is also contradictory. Whilst it records a rejected representation on 15 April 2026, it also records "Representation submitted – Under review", followed by "Enquiry received" and "On Hold: DTES Footage Request". These entries reasonably indicated that the case remained active and under consideration.
Furthermore, when I checked the online portal on Sunday 7 June 2026, the current status displayed was "Under Review". I therefore reasonably believed that my representation was still being considered and that no final decision had yet been made. I had no reason to believe that a Notice of Rejection had been issued or that any appeal deadline was running.
I only became aware of the alleged rejection after receiving the Charge Certificate and contacting TfL by telephone, when I was informed for the first time that a Notice of Rejection had allegedly been issued on 15 April 2026.
Had I received the Notice of Rejection, or had the portal clearly shown that my representation had been rejected, I would have exercised my right to appeal to London Tribunals.
I respectfully requested that the Charge Certificate be withdrawn and the matter restored to a stage at which I could exercise my statutory right of appeal. I also requested a copy of the Notice of Rejection and an explanation for the contradictory online status history.
This is, to the best of my recollection, the wording that I submitted.