3. Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions Round
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]

Author Topic: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions Round  (Read 6493 times)

0 Members and 81 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
« Reply #45 on: »
How do these data address the threshold requirements for a review and under which grounds?
Logged
Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
« Reply #46 on: »
Quote from: H C Andersen on September 21, 2025, 09:54:57 pm
How do these data address the threshold requirements for a review and under which grounds?

Was that aimed at me?

I simply asked @cp8759 whether he was considering an application for review. I did not make any comments or suggestions on the merits or otherwise of doing so. In fact, we don't even have all of the appeal submission so we could not do so.

I then posted a FOI request about this particular location and the contravention as a matter of general interest. Sadly a mere 0.37% of all of the PCNs issued reach the Adjudicator. And only slightly more than half of those that do prevail.
Logged
Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
« Reply #47 on: »
My apologies, I wasn't clear as to whom the post was directed.

Logged
Re: Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions R
« Reply #48 on: »
I don't think there are any grounds for a review, I cannot see that the adjudicator has made any findings of fact or law that she wasn't entitled to make, nor can I see any procedural failings that vitiate the decision. If I was going to pursue a review I would have waited for the outcome of that before posting the outcome.
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
« previous next »
  3. Newham, code 52m failing to comply with a prohibition on certain type of vehicles, Royal Albert Way E16 & Gallions Round