Author Topic: Two NIPs received for immediately consecutive average camera locations  (Read 930 times)

0 Members and 23 Guests are viewing this topic.

I have received two separate NIPs, referring to images from two pairs of average speed cameras time-stamped seven minutes apart, on the same stretch of motorway at immediately consecutive locations on the M1.

Would it be possible to get the second NIP struck-out?

How should I respond to both NIPs?

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Reply to both NIPs correctly and attach a covering letter to both replies requesting that the offence be considered as a single continuous offence rather than two separate offences.

If you don’t ask, you won’t get, and the police are reasonably tolerant of this argument.
Like Like x 1 View List

It has a fair chance if they are the same force, but we have seen several cases on this stretch recently where the offences were 2 separate forces, and the request was denied.  But as jfollows says, worst that can happen is they say no, and you have the 2 offences to deal with.
Like Like x 1 View List

Both NIPs from Derbyshire CREST.

It seems @DurhamDriver was successful here.

I will enclose covering letters.

Send both replies together with covering letter stapled to both, I suggest, if I wasn’t clear. Plus proof of posting from the Post Office as usual.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2025, 11:14:32 am by jfollows »
Agree Agree x 1 View List

I emailed Derbyshire CREST this morning and three hours later I received a response stating that the second notice has been cancelled!

Good result!