Author Topic: Speeding Offence - driver details 'nomination rejected'  (Read 5342 times)

0 Members and 52 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Speeding Offence - driver details 'nomination rejected'
« Reply #30 on: »
Quote
I note that a partial statement setting out a version of events has been included in the images of the PR, which will be before the court. The version of events in that statement appears to contradict the OP's statement that the RK was invited to provide "correct" driver details.

Indeed. It seems the police knew exactly what had transpired (with over 50 driver nominations being made mentioning the same address).

I think your friend needs to plead guilty either online or by post and keep as far away from a courtroom as he can.                           

Re: Speeding Offence - driver details 'nomination rejected'
« Reply #31 on: »
there was no intention to dripfeed info, I'd sent what i had in good faith, not seen all this before.
Maybe not, but between you and the 'perp' that is what has happened and as you can imagine it creates some frustration among those trying to help.

Based on THE INFORMATION WE HAVE I agree with AF, pleading guilty to the charge and not attempting any mitigation or defence seems the best route, I can't imagine anything he could (truthfully) say will make things better and with a scope to make things a LOT worse.
There are motorists who have been scammed and those who are yet to be scammed!

Re: Speeding Offence - driver details 'nomination rejected'
« Reply #32 on: »
UPDATE:
Hi All,
To recap since this post was last year - a relative foolishly duped into paying someone to 'deal with speeding letter', he gave the subsequent police letter to the same people, eventually police wrote to him saying (paraphrased) "this isn't true, and the address/ details you gave are from a nip farm". I subsequently asked here for best suggestions/advice.

I wanted to send an update on this as promised, as others had made contact that they were in the same position too. ('NIP farms' etc)
I recommended the advice given here. He replied to the letters with minimal information, not saying anything more than what was asked/ needed.
His hearing was postponed once, but finally took place a few days ago.  He did not attend (as advised).
He was concerned he'd receive a ban or much worse ie a criminal conviction.
He received a letter today giving him 6 points. I couldn't see the offence code on the letter, but loaded the letter to chatgpt which has said it is an MS90, inferred from the reference to "section 172(3) of the RTA 1988". Nothing on the letter about a fine.

Thanks again to those who helped, and all the best to anyone going through the same. Lesson also to those tempted to use those scammers - they left him high and dry and just stopped answering his calls when sh*t hit the fan, despite all their promises when he first paid them. He only mentioned it to me when they had already replied to two letters for him then gone AWOL, probably because I would've told him it was a bloody stupid decision in the first place!
Informative Informative x 1 View List

Re: Speeding Offence - driver details 'nomination rejected'
« Reply #33 on: »
Further note to add - He has been fined £583 which wasn't on the first letter he received (referenced above).
PS: His uber license is up for renewal, which he applied for a few months ago - Unclear what will become of this with MS90.