Author Topic: Royal Leisure Park W3 NTK  (Read 1141 times)

0 Members and 27 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Royal Leisure Park W3 NTK
« Reply #15 on: »
Just received rejection letter dated 10/2/26 giving me 14 days to appeal or pay £70. As it has taken 10 days to arrive i now only have 4 days to get an appeal in to the IAS. They have the points raised in my appeal. Would appreciate any advice on how to do next appeal or do i just use same points? Thanks.


Re: Royal Leisure Park W3 NTK
« Reply #16 on: »
Have just checked IAS website which says I have 28 days from date of rejection from the operator (BPM state it's 14 days). Can I use the fact they've given incorrect timings in my appeal too?

Re: Royal Leisure Park W3 NTK
« Reply #17 on: »
They haven't addressed the very worn and contradictory markings.

So start writing an appeal to IAS.

It is highly unlikely that this will ever get to court but there will be hoops to jump through.

Make the appeal short and too the point - don't leave IAS with any room to waffle.

Re: Royal Leisure Park W3 NTK
« Reply #18 on: »
Expand on your original points, remembering that the assessor will have no prior knowledge of the car park. Show us a draft before sending anything.

Quote
I'd be minded once you've appealed to file a complaint on the specific issue of their failure to offer a 40% discount.
Have you done this?

Quote
Can I use the fact they've given incorrect timings in my appeal too?
It's not, on the face of it, a reason why the charge is not owed, but I'd put it in there to highlight further evidence of their incompetence.

If you haven't yet complained to BPM about the discount issue, I would also add in a point around them misrepresenting the time allowed to appeal.

Re: Royal Leisure Park W3 NTK
« Reply #19 on: »
They don't appear to be relying on PoFA either.

Can we assume that the driver has never been revealed?

Re: Royal Leisure Park W3 NTK
« Reply #20 on: »
Which parts of PoFA are we suggesting they fail to comply with?

Re: Royal Leisure Park W3 NTK
« Reply #21 on: »
Which parts of PoFA are we suggesting they fail to comply with?

Schedule 4 Paragraph 9(2)(f) requires that the notice state that the creditor will, if all applicable conditions under this Schedule are met, have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount that remains unpaid.


The section in bold appears to be missing from the operators NtK?