Author Topic: PPC PCN Purley Way - Nexus  (Read 282 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Nosy Parker

  • Expert committee
  • *
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: PPC PCN Purley Way - Nexus
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2024, 12:13:17 pm »
It's not an issue about precedence or invoicing.   It's just about reading the words in POFA.  If the PPC delivers a notice within the 'relevant period' and it says all the things required by POFA, it doesn't matter what other notices it sent previously or sends subsequently. 
Like Like x 1 View List

b789

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: PPC PCN Purley Way - Nexus
« Reply #16 on: February 05, 2024, 12:33:47 pm »
I appreciate your point… However, if the first NtK specifically states that the operator is not relying on PoFA as indicated on the NtK here:



Can a subsequent, amended NtK that now relies on PoFA, take precedence as long as it arrives after the initial, non-PoFA NtK as long as it arrives within the relevant period?

Nosy Parker

  • Expert committee
  • *
  • Posts: 139
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: PPC PCN Purley Way - Nexus
« Reply #17 on: February 05, 2024, 06:16:26 pm »
I appreciate your point… However, if the first NtK specifically states that the operator is not relying on PoFA as indicated on the NtK here:
Can a subsequent, amended NtK that now relies on PoFA, take precedence as long as it arrives after the initial, non-PoFA NtK as long as it arrives within the relevant period?
I don't think the words 'non POFA' can be taken as a promise or representation not to invoke PoFA in a subsequent NTK if there is still time to deliver one within the relevant period.  They are simply an acknowledgment that this particular NTK is not PoFA-compliant.
Like Like x 1 View List