Hi,
Wonder if you can help me on next step please.
I recently received a PCN dated 01/04/2025 for a contravention which occurred 06/10/2024. A reminder was sent again on 14/05/2025.
I sent an email to CUP the below email which I got from a similar topic on this forum ....
Apparently the case has been passed to the debt recovery. IS there any chance i can submit an appeal to the POPLA?
************************************
Email to CUP enformcement I am the registered keeper of the vehicle, though I dispute your alleged ‘parking charge’.
I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory and incompetent conduct to your client landowner.
Your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with all the mandatory requirements set out in Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA).
It would appear that CUP Enforcement has failed to grasp that PoFA compliance is not a "close enough" exercise. Partial or even substantial compliance does not suffice.
The timeline of the alleged offence:
Date of alleged contravention: Sunday, 6th of October 2024
Date of NtK issue: Tuesday, 1st of April January 2025
First date of presumed delivery: Thursday, 3rd of April 2025
For your NtK to be PoFA-compliant, it should have been issued by Wednesday, 20th of October 2024, at the latest. Clearly, it was not.
I remind you that liability under PoFA is strictly limited to the driver unless the NtK is served within the relevant period and in full compliance with the statutory provisions. As your NtK fails this threshold, you are unable to hold me, the registered keeper, liable.
There is no legal obligation on the keeper to identify the driver to an unregulated private parking company. There will be no admission as to who was driving. No assumptions or inferences can be drawn. The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have been the driver, nor pursued under incorrect interpretation of the law of agency.
I note your NtK. I refer you to the answer given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram (1971).
In that spirit, I suggest you cancel this PCN as it fails to comply with the required law. There is minimal chance of this PCN passing legal muster when the facts are heard at a future complaint/appeal (at POPLA). It would be prudent on CUP to minimise costs incurred when the outcome is most likely to be negative due to reasons stated above.
I look forward to confirmation that this matter is now closed.
*********************************************************
CUP where quite prompt with the reply...here is there reply....
Thank you for your email regarding Parking Charge Notice 41814.
Please be advised that motorists are required to submit an appeal within 28 days of receiving the Notice to Keeper. As this deadline has now passed, the opportunity to appeal has been forfeited.
Regarding your query about the timing of PCN 41814, please note that the British Parking Association (BPA) Code of Practice sets out the standards that all accredited parking operators must follow. Specifically, Section 22.8 states:
“While we have an expectation that operators will seek to use PoFA legislation, it is appreciated that there will be occasions where this might not be possible. If a Non-PoFA Notice to Keeper is being issued, it must be sent out as soon as possible and no later than 7 months after the original parking event.”
We can confirm that the notice in question was issued within the allowable time frame in accordance with this guidance.
As such, the case has now been passed to debt recovery, and CUP Enforcement is no longer the creditor. Any further correspondence should be directed to the recovery agency currently handling the case.
Best Wishes,
CUP Administration
CUP EnforcementProtection| Parking Enforcement| Security
W: |
www.cupenforcement.comT: 0844-856-4508
E: info@cupenforcement.com
*************************************************************************************
[ Guests cannot view attachments ] [ Guests cannot view attachments ]
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]