Author Topic: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay  (Read 1863 times)

0 Members and 52 Guests are viewing this topic.

Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« on: »
Hi All,

Hope you are well.

Fresh through the letterbox, a PCN from parking eye for a car registered in my name. I wasn't driving...

It shows that the car stayed in a parking area monitored by Parking Eye for 3 hours 13 minutes but signage apparently says that the maximum time to stay is 2 hours.

The times shows in the CCTV image match times stated, registration is correct.





I do not have pictures of the signage but I know that it does give a 2 hour period so I cannot dispute that. It's well known, even by the driver at the time but kids, lunch over clouded the mind apparently..

Do I pay up or do I appeal?

I hope this meets the rules and requirements here.

Many thanks for any input.

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #1 on: »
CEO@asda.com should be your first port of call. Search the forum also.

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #2 on: »
Will do, thank you!

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #3 on: »
I found an address which is apparently the CEO's email, I feel like I will be surprised if I get a reply.

Should I appeal the ticket as a matter of avoiding being liable for a higher fee?

Many thanks

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #4 on: »
"Higher fee"? You mean you are considering paying it at the 'mugs discount' rate? Why would you want to pay a speculative invoice from an unregulated private parking firm for an alleged breach of contract by the driver, just because they are offering you a 40% discount?

This is exactly how these firms persuade the low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree to part with their money. Perhaps I knew your address and sent you a speculative invoice for £100 but if you pay me within 14 days, I will only charge you £60. Bargain?
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #5 on: »
You are correct but it's hard to navigate handling this without the hassle and threats of court, baliffs etc.

We have a receipt for shopping in Asda, the customer service said they don't cancel tickets as they can't.. No reply from CEO email and linked in.

So I must appeal online it seems and let them know Asda was used, along with a lunch and coffee with kids, hence the time spent.

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #6 on: »
A fairly generic appeal from pieces I've gathered through searching. I hope this is sufficient, any advice appreciated.

I am the registered keeper of the vehicle.

I dispute this charge for the following reasons:

• ParkingEye has failed to demonstrate that the signage at Asda Sutton at the time was clear, prominent and fully compliant with the BPA Code of Practice.
• No evidence has been provided that the ANPR system is synchronised, accurate, or compliant with BPA requirements.
• The mandatory grace periods (arrival and departure) have not been applied.
• As the keeper, I cannot be held liable because ParkingEye has not demonstrated full compliance with Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.
• If you refuse this appeal, please supply a POPLA code.

Please treat this as a request for cancellation or escalation to POPLA.

Yours,

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #7 on: »
• The mandatory grace periods (arrival and departure) have not been applied.
The minimum grace period is 10 minutes, they are alleging an overstay of 1 hour 13 minutes, so I'd leave this one out.

Any initial appeal will be rejected. If you're still working on escalation with Asda themselves, don't miss the deadline to appeal, but don't appeal any sooner than you need to.

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #8 on: »
Amazing, thank you.

I have been supplied a receipt with 12:25 as payment time.

It has been 14 days from issue date, appeal deadline is 28 from delivery of ntk.

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #9 on: »
You are showing your gullibility as soon as you mention your worry about "court and bailiffs". this is exactly what these firms prey on.

These unregulated private parking firms and their pet debt collectors thrive on one thing: the public’s ignorance of how County Court claims and CCJs actually work. They know that if they can make you believe that “a claim” or a “debt recovery” letter somehow wrecks your credit rating, you will panic and pay them. The gullible tree is full of low-hanging fruit, and they make a very good living shaking it.

Here is the reality, which you should read and take a “life lesson” from...

A Parking Charge Notice (PCN) from a private firm is not a fine. It is just a speculative invoice for an alleged breach of contract by the driver. At that stage, nothing touches your credit file.

If you are not successful in appealing the PCN – and appeals are almost never successful at the initial stage and rarely at the secondary, supposedly “independent” (but not) appeal – most low-hanging fruit do not understand that those decisions are not binding on them and they should never just pay. Many do, however, because they are ignorant of the process and fearful of imaginary consequences.

If you then get “debt recovery” letters from so-called debt collectors, those are just more speculative invoices dressed up in scary language designed to prey on your ignorance and fear. Debt collectors have no legal powers whatsoever to come to your door, take goods, or report anything to credit reference agencies. You could receive fifty of those letters and your credit rating would be unchanged.

As part of the modus operandi of these unregulated firms, the next formal step is usually a Letter of Claim (LoC). That is just a threat that they may start a County Court claim. Even then, your credit record is still untouched. It is simply a threat of legal action, not the result of it. Just more attempts to intimidate the low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree into paying out of ignorance and fear.

Only if they go ahead and issue a County Court claim do you enter the court (judicial) process. A Claim Form comes from the court, not from a useless and powerless debt collector. Getting a claim issued against you does not, by itself, affect your credit rating. A claim is simply an allegation that you owe money. You have the right to defend it. As long as you read your post, acknowledge the claim in time, and either defend it or settle it, your credit file remains untouched.

A County Court Judgment (CCJ) only arises if the court actually makes a judgment against you. That happens either because you defended and were unsuccessful at a hearing, or because you ignored the claim and the parking firm got judgment in default. Even then, you still have a crucial safety net that the low-hanging fruit do not realise exists. If you pay the full judgment sum within 30 days of the date of judgment, the CCJ is not registered on your credit file. It is expunged completely from the record. It is as if it never happened as far as lenders are concerned.

A CCJ only appears on your credit record if you fail to pay within that 30-day window. That is the point at which it gets recorded and can affect your ability to obtain credit. Up to that point, no amount of tickets, no stack of debt recovery letters, no Letter of/Before Claim, and not even the issuing of a County Court claim has any impact on your credit history.

Bailiffs are a separate step again. They cannot simply be sent because you have ignored an unregulated private parking invoice or a useless debt recovery letter. Bailiffs (enforcement agents) only become relevant after there is a CCJ and it has not been paid.

For most smaller PCN CCJs, it is not even worth the creditor’s time and cost to instruct bailiffs, especially when the amount is under £600 and stuck in the slower County Court enforcement system. But the key point is this: no unpaid CCJ, no lawful bailiff.

So when people say things like “I had a debt recovery letter so I might not get a mortgage now” or “if I defend, I will get a CCJ,” they are simply wrong. It is precisely that ignorance and fear that these firms trade on. They rely on ordinary motorists incorrectly assuming that a red-letter demand automatically means ruined credit and bailiffs at the door.

There is nothing in the advice given here that will affect your credit record. On the contrary, proper advice is what keeps you away from CCJs. If you engage with the process, defend where appropriate, and, in the extremely rare instance where you are unsuccessful defending a claim, pay any judgment within 30 days, your credit file will remain completely unaffected and no bailiff will lawfully darken your doorstep over a private parking charge.

These companies rely on being able to intimidate the low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree into paying out of ignorance and fear.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #10 on: »
Thank you for that, I'll admit being gullible, it's a shame that people just go and pay. Every parking firm seems to have different methods of appeal so had to come here to ask. I do not want to pay them, that's for sure.

So I guess I have to engage, rather than just ignore. So I am planning to submit the below through their appeal platform to get the ball rolling



I am the registered keeper of the vehicle.

I dispute this charge for the following reasons:

• ParkingEye has failed to demonstrate that the signage at Asda Sutton at the time was clear, prominent and fully compliant with the BPA Code of Practice.
• No evidence has been provided that the ANPR system is synchronised, accurate, or compliant with BPA requirements.
• As the keeper, I cannot be held liable because ParkingEye has not demonstrated full compliance with Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.
• If you refuse this appeal, please supply a POPLA code.

Please treat this as a request for cancellation or escalation to POPLA.

Yours,

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #11 on: »
No, don't use that. Their Notice to Keeper is not PoFA complaint. Any initial appeal will be rejected anyway. Follow this advice:

There is no legal obligation on the known keeper (the recipient of the Notice to Keeper (NtK)) to reveal the identity of the unknown driver and no inference or assumptions can be made.

The NtK is not compliant with all the requirements of PoFA which means that if the unknown driver is not identified, they cannot transfer liability for the charge from the unknown driver to the known keeper.

Use the following as your appeal. No need to embellish or remove anything from it:

Quote
I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner.

As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions can be drawn. Parkingeye has relied on contract law allegations of breach against the driver only.

The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable. Parkingeye have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #12 on: »
HAHA I love the reply! That's more like it.

Thank you, this is very useful information, thanks for the education here and advice.

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #13 on: »
Update:

Reply from PE, sent via E-mail. Surprised my spam filter let it through.

If you don't tell us who was driving, we'll come for you..




Can I appeal again with the same reply and keep this looping? :)

Re: Parking Eye - PCN - Asda Sutton Overstay
« Reply #14 on: »
That email is a standard “name the driver or we’ll pursue the keeper” pressure letter. You do not have any legal obligation to identify the driver.

If you do not name the driver, ParkingEye can only hold the keeper liable if they have fully complied with every requirement of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA). As their NtK is not fully compliant with every element of PoFA, they cannot transfer liability from the driver to the keeper, regardless of what that email says.

Respond with the following:

Quote
Dear ParkingEye,

I am the registered keeper. I will not be naming the driver.

There is no legal obligation for a keeper to identify the driver, and no adverse inference can be drawn.

In any event, you cannot transfer liability to the keeper because your Notice to Keeper does not comply with ALL the requirements of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Accordingly, there is no keeper liability.

Please either confirm cancellation or issue a POPLA code.

Yours faithfully,

(keeper name)
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain