3. That Kingston box junction
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: That Kingston box junction  (Read 37782 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #30 on: »
https://moderngov.kingston.gov.uk/mgChooseDocPack.aspx?ID=10406&SID=23762

The Road Traffic (Parking Adjudicators) (London) Regulations 1993
These Regulations prescribe the procedure to be followed in relation to proceedings before parking adjudicators appointed under section 73 of the Road Traffic Act 1991.
legislation.gov.uk
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #31 on: »
Review hearing: 2250674379. 22nd July at 12.30 hrs. Not to be missed. The YBJ Guru is on board too.

You can phone the tribunal for the link or ask me.

A crescendo is taking place.
« Last Edit: July 09, 2026, 11:38:07 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: That Kingston box junction
« Reply #32 on: »
Review successful: 2250674379  ;D  Decision tomorrow. For the avoidance of doubt, for which RBK are wholly responsible: this concerns the junction with Elm Road. Not the other one with Westbury Road.  8)

The Head of Highways (Matthew Hill) and the author of the Consultancy Report (Keith Firth) did not attend even though I requested them to do so. Not even a response.

Taking next week off to compose the JR application.  This is yet another PCN which should not have been issued. I have researched every allowed decisions from 1st January 2024 to the present day and the results are staggering.

Needless to say, the refused decisions would have had a different result with proper representations with help from us. Perhaps.
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 11:55:40 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Pages: 1 2 [3]
« previous next »
  3. That Kingston box junction