Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - d612

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
The Flame Pit / Re: Early MOT of SORNED vehicle without road tax?
« on: March 31, 2026, 07:27:09 pm »
Yes - I do this every year with my not quite yet classic second car.
I have it SORN over the winter in my garages.
Take it direct to the MOT due in spring in this state.
and drive it direct back home again once passed.
Then once the weather gets better(!) I tax it for the year and use it.
Then around Nov I cancel the tax and get the refund.
Generally I arrange the MOT a week or so prior to its expiry date

One thing I do is put a sheet of paper on the passenger seat "saying this car is on SORN"
To warn the garage doing the MOT not to park much less drive the car on the road.

2
Well my viewpoint is that sadly you have no escape on this one: others may differ in their comments.

Red light offences are 'absolute' I think it's called such that there is no excuse permitted.
If say you had moved forward at an angle into the LH lane with no intention to turn right but did so to let an ambulance/fire engine etc through on red for them to turn right then again sadly you would be "done" for crossing the stop line.

This is why on my local dual carriageway we regularly get police and ambulances stuck behind the two lanes of traffic waiting at traffic lights on red and not one single person is going to move. Only if personally directed in person by a police officer in uniform are you allowed to cross the line at a red indicating traffic light. Them blaring their horn behind you to move does not count!

3
I'd suspect that the OP did cross the stop line of the "turn right" lane albeit it at an angle while moving left into the straight ahead lane, thereby triggering the camera from the sensor pads in the road.
The offence as I understand it is of crossing the line when the lights for that lane are red regardless of where the driver wanted to go.  Even if you cross the line for emergency services (and you should not) you are guitly of crossing the line 
If they were hard up against the stop line in the right hand lane it would be almost impossible (without reversing!) to get into the LH lane without crossing the stop line in front of them.  If they were a bit further back of course then they could do it.

4
You could try posting on rail forums sub
See
https://www.railforums.co.uk/forums/disputes-prosecutions.152/

that said, from my casual browsing on the forum in the past it seems to me TFL are very litigious (more so than the overground train operators) and if you can get away with a fine rather than a prosecution which is what they usually go for then grab it with both hands and pay up pronto.

6
The Flame Pit / Re: Cancelled speeding NIP
« on: December 09, 2025, 09:50:55 pm »
There is also this thread on the MSE site where it appears (from the last post) that a significant number of booked and accepted speed awareness course are being cancelled and refunded - presumably with a view to cancelling the entire NIP.
So all in all indeed something odd is going on

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/6645074/your-national-motorway-awareness-course-offer-has-been-withdrawn-by-west-midlands-police/p2

7
News / Press Articles / Re: Oxford congestion charges starts
« on: October 31, 2025, 07:38:00 pm »
Natural progression in stages
First we get the LTN's where rat runs are closed to through traffic forcing everything onto other roads making them now clogged up all day.
We are now at the next stage of trying to force a reduction in the traffic levels through "fines".

As you say it getting out of hand. Those living in a LTN road are generally delighted as traffic has dropped to near zero, while those on the other roads are furious. Meanwhile builders and indeed myself on one occassion no longer bother and simply park illegally and get the fine and add it to the bill: which in itself suggests that the fines are too low if it becomes simply another cost of doing business. All this quite apart from the cost of parking legally in the first place if you can find a place.

The stated objective of this congestion charge is to stop people driving across the city so you can avoid it by driving out to the ring road, round that and then back in to where you want to go, so its not a true 'ring of steel'. At a cost of course of added congestion on the ring roads. 

How it all work out depends on how many permits the locals use up and how much they want the convience of afterwards simply paying £5 vs that of having to drive out, round and back again, vs the obvious one of not bothering and staying at home instead.

The council are at the same time making all the park and rides - or rather the Ride bit free with a valid park part ticket. Previously you both paid to park and paid to take the bus in.

8
News / Press Articles / Oxford congestion charges starts
« on: October 30, 2025, 12:55:34 pm »
Just a heads up
The Oxford congestion charge started this week.
The rules are complex as an usual my disclaimler here is that you need to review the OCC websites for the exact terms rules etc and not rely on the broad rough summary below:

By and large is a 7am to 7pm
It applies to cars only. Commercial vehicles are exempt.
No idea about Camper vans......lots of issues for private cars used for commercial purposes and the hoops to go though to register them: business evidence etc.
Resident of the central area are exempt
Residents of the suburbs get 100 permits per year.
Residents of rest of the county get 25 permits per year.
Blue badge holders (having registered their car) are exempt
No idea how it is meant to work when a car owned by a abled bodied resident entitling them to 25 permits is used to give a lift to a blue badge holder into the city which should be an exempt trip.
Once you have gone though the camera once and used up a permit you can go back and fro any number of times without any additional permit used up... but see below for complications.
If you are not entitled to some form of exemption for the day then its £5.

All of this produces some strange anomolies.
If you have two cars of which you are the keeper then you can register both to have your 25 permits. If however you re-register the DVLA keeper of your second car as another member of the houshold then you can get 25 permits for each car: so your household now has a total of 50 permits. There is a limit to how many cars per household that can be regstered.
If you have two cars registered to you and use one in the morning to drive in that is one permits used up.  If you use it again in the afternoon that is still covered by your permit usage from the morning.  BUT if you use your other car in the afternoon then that is another seperate permit used up.

So far I gather OCC has registered around 50K cars/permits so far.  You need to supply personal/address ID and copies of the vehicle V5 registered at your address to prove you are the keeper and hence your entitlement if applicable to a permit at either the exempt, 100 permits, 25 permit level.


9
The Flame Pit / Re: Change of address, V5, licence
« on: October 19, 2025, 05:44:23 pm »
The news about the new ID certification requirements for directors and company secretaries coming in and the requirement to use gov onelogin for future transactions on the Companies House Website have been circulated umpteen times by C.House to the official email address of the company registered with them.

The requirement to supply an official company email address for all communications from Companies house has existed for maybe 2 years.  There is pretty well no excuse not to know about it for those that should know.  I'm sure the BBC will catch up when we get the usual moans and outrage from those that claim they knew "nothing about it" and their company has been struck off as a result of not complying.  Then the BBC/D.Mail/Express can run a suitable rage bait headline

Not before time actually. Multiple entries for directors using different versions of their name ( full or only first and surname) or address and the use of ficticious address has been going on for years, not to mention the typos's which result in multiple entries for the same named director: I had two seperate and distinct entries as a formation agent mistyped my postcode, when I should have had both companies listed together under my name.



10
Just off St John's Wood Road there is another double vehicle charging twin bay.
This time more properely marked
(Grove End road)
https://maps.app.goo.gl/EdA5UFkuYRQwTKNN7



11
Their only evidence is a video of your alleged contravention. This is normally avaiilable on the council web site. Have you viewed it ? I looked at it, and whilst it shows your car turning left into the first exit from the roundabout, it doesn't actually show you passing a sign forbidding this movement.  This is because the camera is in the wrong position to do so.


Unfortuntely there is a "No Left Turn" sign mounted on the "Give Way" post at the very stop point of the roundabout junction.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/WEezhCwiK8GtLA3X8

There is also two intial signs explaining and forbidding the Left Turn onto Iffley Road further back along the street and there are no way a car can get to the roundabout junction without passing this sign
https://maps.app.goo.gl/j8Vb6E4qvzg5qXMJ8

13
It was around this time last year that the Cameras went up...as people were not obeying the restriction on the highly back angled direct left turn off Cowley Rd onto Iffley Rd at The Plain roundabout.
Decision to install them was made in late 2023
https://news.oxfordshire.gov.uk/anpr-camera-approved-to-improve-safety-at-the-plain-roundabout-in-oxford/

The restriction itself has been in force for maybe 10 years.
Here is the view approaching the turn
https://maps.app.goo.gl/HayTUngnVEBeKtDG9

14
Quote
If you look at the NIP the first line of the address (which is not blanked out) is "The Company Secretary"

It says "To the Company Secretary (if applicable)"

I think they all say that.

Not the one I helped someone fill in within the last 6 months from Thames Valley Police.
It was addressed directly and soley to the individual who was the registered keeper.
It added on in a couple of lines adjacent to the individual and their address that "If the addresse is a limited company the requirement for driver details is for the Company Secretary"

It may be other Police forces have different policies.....

15
I've seen hospital carparks like that.
As I recall barrier on entry which records your licence plate.
Then...if over the free period you pay at a paymachine putting in your number plate details and then exit at the barrier which again records your numberplate on exit, checks for payment and lifts for you.
Alternatively if you are within the free period you just drive up to the barrier and it opens for you....which I have been in all cases.

I've no idea what happens if you don't pay, and then just drive up to the exist barrier - does it block your exit until you do? no idea.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4