1
The Flame Pit / Re: Endemic: Drivers over speed when you change lane
« on: May 30, 2026, 07:58:47 pm »Quote
As usually I am bringing another interesting topicThat’s a matter of some debate.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
As usually I am bringing another interesting topicThat’s a matter of some debate.
Thank you for your response. I will delete this thread now.You can’t.
I checked the law on obstructing cameras
I have nothing but admiration for the patience and diligence shown by the judge!He needs a better proofreader though.
Which is all very good, but irrelevant if the OP wasn’t the RK. That being said, the fact that he uses “claimant” rather suggests that he is confusing criminal and civil procedural rules.
My understanding is that for service to be valid at a "last known address" (if this in fact becomes the prosecution's defence), the claimant must have been unable to ascertain a defendant's current residence; I'm not confident this can be true given the number of public records which refer to my current address.
When a NIP and/or S172 request is to be sent to the Registered Keeper, the "last known address" is taken as that shown on the DVLA record at the date of the (alleged) offence. In most cases that is correct.
The police are not required to trawl other records on the off-chance that it might be wrong, and in any case it would be impractical. The DVLA record ties a particular individual to the vehicle in question. There may be many others with the same name, e.g. John Smith, and no easy way to know which John Smith's new address they are seeking.