Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - dyslexicdog

Pages: [1]
1
I am RK with matching DL details at current address.

Interestingly, I made a compliant outside the typical channels and got someone to review the body cam footage where I highlighted to the CEO the other vehicles parked in contravention showing unfair and inconsistent application of the rules. Photographic evidence was provided to show lack of PCNs on any other vehicle to back up my point.

They have since decided to cancel the PCN.

👌

2
I would appreciate that.

In fact, I’d happily donate the PCN charge to the site upkeep if it can get cancelled.

3
Hi,

Checking if I have any room to get this PCN cancelled.

I parked roughly here at 1349. At the time I parked tightly between two vehicles. No bay markings were visible as they were obscured by the cars on either side. When I returned to my car at 1420, following an alarm alert, I discovered the PCN. By then, the cars beside me had left, which created the misleading appearance that I had ignored the bay markings, which had only then become visible.

Having looked across the row, it was clear that many vehicles had been forced to shuffle up, making it difficult for several drivers to remain within the lines. I personally observed at least three other cars in the same situation, none of which had received PCNs. The CEO shrugged off this which I felt shoed inconsistent application of the rules.

I also spoke politely with the parking attendant, who acknowledged that the parking situation on 23/09 was unusually difficult due to the volume of cars and limited space.

Pictures of the vehicle







PCN Attached to vehicle

PCN

Assumed entrance sign

https://maps.app.goo.gl/xs3DoA97pYaQMarF6

I made an informal challenge based on the text above which was rejected, as many believe is expected:

Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding the above Penalty Charge Notice (PCN). After consideration of the circumstances I regret I have found no grounds for the cancellation of the penalty charge.

The PCN was correctly issued as your vehicle was Code 86 Parked beyond the bay markings.

When your vehicle was inspected it was parked across two bays and under these circumstances our Enforcement Officers are obliged to issue a PCN. Even if other drivers had parked out of a bay or partially over the line then you should not have followed suit, and an alternative bay should have been sought or if the car park was full another car park should have been used. There are signs on this car park to inform the motorist they must park between the white posts.

It is the responsibility of the driver to check the highway regulations at the time of parking. Your reasons are therefore not accepted as grounds for cancellation of the PCN.


I'd be interested to understand whether posts and can be used as bay markings, the signage is adequete or if there are other routes to be taken to get this cancelled.

Thank you in advance.

Anthony.

4
Your VRM is on show if that matters to you 🤔

@dyslexicdog
Have you read
https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/
?

I have.

With the information provided, anyone could create problems for the OP with the information that has been provided so my intention was to make OP aware so they could make their own decision on risk.

Overall, I’m here to learn and discuss.

5
Your VRM is on show if that matters to you 🤔

8
Well, that was remarkably quick! 'Plan A' is always the easiest option, especially with ParkingEye.

Beats me how it was so quick as I wasn't expecting a response so fast. Can't grumble really.

Anyone wise on whether I should expect a cancellation from Parkingeye to confirm or the email from the venue is the best I'll get?

:)

10
I have started Plan A.

Please find attached the PCN issued to the keeper of the vehicle XXXXXXX.

The driver parked in the carpark as part of the event being held at the time, a School Prom. This was on the 12th July 2024.

As discussed, Parkingeye manage this on behalf of the land owner and state this within the PCN. It would be greatly appreciated that because the driver was attending the Holiday Inn as part of a paid event, the landowner could get the PCN cancelled with written confirmation.

I attached the notice to the registered keeper.

Kind Regards,

Dyslexicdog

11
Hi All,

The keeper has received a PCN from Parking Eye, dated 17/07/2024. The event in question is from 12/07/2024 19:12 until 13/07/2024.

I have attached the sanitised version of the notice which is addressed to the keeper - PCN Notice

The driver is a staff member at a school that hosted it's prom in this location on the date mentioned. The carpark had the barriers up upon entry and no signage was noticed, however, upon talking with other staff members today, it's not clear whether this was lack of driver observation upon parking.

The venue has a tablet to enter the VRN into to provide free parking, this was not carried out.

The keeper has contacted the venue and while they say they will see what they do, it's clear the onus is on the driver to enter the VRN. No written contact has been carried out yet as the keeper would like to engage the smart folks here.

The intention of the keeper is to get clear signage photos later today/weekend as Google Maps (LINK) is from 2023 and does not show any clear signage.

Please help inform the keeper of the options.

Thank you in advance.

 :)

Note - I cannot upload directly to the server as it states the upload folder is full. I have used a OneDrive link.

Pages: [1]