Hi everyone,
We are a vehicle hire firm, and we recently encountered an issue with a London council rejecting our representation to transfer liability for a new PCN to the hirer. The council's reason was that the hire agreement for the current PCN did not match an agreement related to a past, unrelated PCN (was paid and closed).
For context, with the hirer’s permission, we provided two separate hire agreements: one specifically for bus lane PCNs and another for standard traffic PCNs. This allows us to transfere liability to the hirer in all circumstances.
This raises a few questions, and we'd appreciate any insights:
Are councils allowed to compare historical PCNs with new ones and make decisions based on these comparisons?
If a past PCN is closed and settled, shouldn’t it remain separate and not be referenced in new cases?
Shouldn’t each PCN be considered on its own merit, rather than being influenced by previously closed cases?
How far back can they go to compare PCNs in this way? Does legislation permit them to use prior cases as a basis for decisions on current ones? We could have produced and fixed old hire agreements..
Thanks for any advice or experiences you can share on this.