3. SOUHWARK : charged twice for 53c grove lane junction de crespigny park/windsor walk
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: SOUHWARK : charged twice for 53c grove lane junction de crespigny park/windsor walk  (Read 900 times)

0 Members and 90 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: SOUHWARK : charged twice for 53c grove lane junction de crespigny park/windsor walk
« Reply #15 on: »
I am sorry. i used my google timeline as the basis for that info. i don't know how or where that restriction is in realo life and to be honest in the videos all i see is a car drivinhg then a car driving again.

Please don't be cross about my lack of understanding. i am an infrequent driver and did not know about these restricted bits. That's all.

Thank you for trying to help me though.  I have a plan and am getting email help  from Hipprocrates from this point and gosh I do need it eh???

Sorry if I sound defeated. I am not, only deflated.

Again, thank you for your time HC
Logged
Re: SOUHWARK : charged twice for 53c grove lane junction de crespigny park/windsor walk
« Reply #16 on: »
I am going to complain to the council and the hirer.
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: SOUHWARK : charged twice for 53c grove lane junction de crespigny park/windsor walk
« Reply #17 on: »
Quote from: John U.K. on July 20, 2025, 09:44:39 pm
What is the relevant clause in your hire agreement about paying PCNs, etc.?

I don't think the OP has answered this question?

There was an argument on this website that if hire companies have a term in the hire contract allowing them to pay PCNs without referral to the hirer, then such a term would be an unfair term under s63 of the
Consumer Rights Act 2015
An Act to amend the law relating to the rights of consumers and protection of their interests; to make provision about investigatory powers for enforcing the regulation of traders; to make provisio...
legislation.gov.uk
insofar as such a term prevents the hirer from exercising their legal right to challenge the PCN, and therefore the term is legally unenforceable by the hire company against the hirer.

So in theory the hirer would be able to recover any recharge from the hire company.

Whether this argument has been properly tested, I don't know...
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  3. SOUHWARK : charged twice for 53c grove lane junction de crespigny park/windsor walk