Author Topic: PCN Contravention code 62 Parked with one one wheels on or over a footpath, PCN Contravention code 62 Parked with one on  (Read 852 times)

0 Members and 190 Guests are viewing this topic.

I parked the car to drop the kids in the park for their sports session and found the PCN was on my car
there were many car parked in such manner and it was sunday

location https://goo.gl/maps/D7n12WkTRGEp79oF9

PCN image below

https://ibb.co/28T25P1

Contravention Code 62 - Parked with one or more wheels on or over a footpath or any part of a road other than a carriageway

https://ibb.co/LSwZ1LN
https://ibb.co/HKZvYxr

do i have any chance to appeal ?
all suggestions welcome

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
« Last Edit: September 10, 2023, 06:32:45 pm by cp8759 »

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Please post both sides of the PCN (without redactions) - mistakes are often in the 'small print'.

Your GSV link is broken - here??
https://goo.gl/maps/x22uHg1wNJZT6HAZ6
« Last Edit: September 10, 2023, 04:18:02 pm by John U.K. »

on GSV show us exactly where you parked it appears that there is only a small area where footway parking is purportedly not allowed but i would venture the resolution that allows footway parking does not exclude that area

Google location

https://goo.gl/maps/bH82ywqmvRnovBCL7


have added the PCN full photos plus google map location

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
« Last Edit: September 10, 2023, 06:33:29 pm by cp8759 »


apologies i have added the full now

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Draft representation:

Dear London Borough of Redbridge,

Footway parking is allowed on the entirety of Greenleafe Drive, please see the documents at link1 and link2.

In light of the above, the penalty charge notice must be cancelled.

Yours faithfully,

The links in question will point to https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1BxppUfdcrUYelGCDh0tHUZdkjNW6lgru and https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1xNESNzkLQ1oPEG78bK9ksWZSEBlsVQBk but do not put these links in the representation, use the ones I'll send you via private message.

The reason for this is that we can check the click count and if it remains at zero, we can prove they've not looked at the documents and that is a failure to consider, which is a procedural impropriety.

For that reason, please do not click on the links in my PM or you'll sabotage the plan.
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order

thanks for your reply

which option to select when appealing ?


The alleged contravention did not occur.

The Penalty exceeds the relevant amount.

Procedural Impropriety.

Traffic order not valid.
 
Other grounds.

thanks for your reply

which option to select when appealing ?


The alleged contravention did not occur.

The Penalty exceeds the relevant amount.

Procedural Impropriety.

Traffic order not valid.
 
Other grounds.

The alleged contravention did not occur.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

I have recieved a reply from redbridge and they have rejected the appeal stating that

'You have Parked on the wrong side of the arrow on the sign and therefore the PCN stands'

docs attached please advise

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Well they've not looked at either link:



Just wait for the Notice to Owner and let us know when you get it. In the meantime please double check that the address on your V5C is up to date and 100% correct.
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order

I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order

I have received now "Notice to Owner" dated 17th October 2023
Please advise what to do next
Thanks

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Go onto the council website and challenge as follows:

Dear London Borough of Redbridge,

I require you to consider my informal representations as my formal representations.

Yours faithfully,
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order

Thanks
do i need to add any evidence or just this should be enough to point them to informal evidence submitted already ?


secondly which option i need to select this one ?

There has been a procedural impropriety on the part of the enforcement authority.
or
The alleged contravention did not occur.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2023, 12:05:37 pm by technicaldna »