3. Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie  (Read 613 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #15 on: »
Quote from: Incandescent on October 19, 2024, 07:09:42 pm
Just goes to show that until one sees the video, one can only rely on the OPs version of events. It's only right at the end of the video, when the van moves off, that one see the queue of traffic behind it which the OP passed at speed.
Yes, a definite lose at London Tribunals unless the OP can tell us more.


on the approach 2 cars were struck behind the van on hazard and all were stopped behind the van - but there were more cars on front of me over taking the stopped vehicle behind the van on hazard - so i continued as them.

Logged
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #16 on: »
best you are given realistic advice. in this case unless someone sees anthing wrong with the paper work...
Logged
Quote from: andy_foster
Mick, you are a very, very bad man
Like Like x 1 View List
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #17 on: »
on the approach 2 cars were struck behind the van on hazard and all were stopped behind the van - but there were more cars on front of me over taking the stopped vehicle behind the van on hazard - so i continued as them.

The video doesn't show this(even if this was a defence).

Your call.
Logged
Like Like x 1 View List
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #18 on: »
Adjudicators are usually very strict on these - following other vehicles is not a defence unless there is some kind of incident or blockage that is reasonably beyond your control.

See this one where we think there is case owing to some kind of accident and police presence. In the thread you'll see I posted a decision and video where you would have thought there's a good case but t was refused. But adjudicators can differ of course.

https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/barnet-council-pcn-38l-failing-to-comply-with-a-sign-indicating-that-vehiculartr/
Logged
Like Like x 1 View List
Re: Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie
« Reply #19 on: »
Quote from: stamfordman on October 19, 2024, 09:02:47 pm
Adjudicators are usually very strict on these - following other vehicles is not a defence unless there is some kind of incident or blockage that is reasonably beyond your control.

See this one where we think there is case owing to some kind of accident and police presence. In the thread you'll see I posted a decision and video where you would have thought there's a good case but t was refused. But adjudicators can differ of course.

https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/barnet-council-pcn-38l-failing-to-comply-with-a-sign-indicating-that-vehiculartr/

Thank you - i am checking the details of the case you referred.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  3. Redbridge: Failing to comply with a sign indicating that vehicular traffic must pass to the specifie