... Do the documents you provided have your correct and current address? And is that the E13 8AY address? And please confirm that you actually live there?...
... You wrote twice (and a third garbled letter) to the London Tribunals and they sent their responses to an address that is six years out of date, even though that is not the correspondence address you provided.
The Tribunal could only have received that address from the Council...
... Might there be something else going on that you haven't disclosed?...
Re the Tribunal replying to the wrong address. In reply #149 Maks said:
"In the photo of the letter and envelope you can see my address, but in the reply I painted over my old address from 6 years ago"
Now I'm not certain what that means(!), but it would be consistent with the OP inadvertantly supplying an old address to the Tribunal.
If that is so, I wonder if (accidentally) he also supplied the wrong address to Newham when he made his representaions and that is where the NORs have gone(?)
If only it were that simple.
The two good letters sent to the Tribunal were sent by post, recorded delivery.
@maks posted up photos of the letters and they had the E13 8AY address. As I recall the first garbled letter might not have had any correspondence address on the letter except for the return address on the envelope.
The posted copy of the Tribunals first refusal to schedule an appeal never arrived. However the letter was subsequently received attached to an email.
@maks scrubbed the address on the emailed copy before posting it up. Later we were shown the address, an address in E12 5AZ.
The E13 8AY address was also on the V5c and all of the documents received at the impound yard. It's also on 4 sets of NTOs, Charge Certs, OfR and bailiff Notices of Enforcement, all of which
@maks received. And also on two non-statutory follow up letters from Rundles.
So I'm confident that
@maks has been using the correct address. And the only way I can explain the E12 5AZ address on the Tribunals letter is that the Council gave it to the Tribunal and they used it despite the address on
@maks letter.
Despite several requests Newham have not provided the original Notice of Rejection and nor have they provided it in response to his SAR request and follow ups.
In addition this whole unfortunate tangled mess appears to have occurred because
@maks did not have a valid parking permit for the car. In one of his posts told us that he had a lot of difficulty with his permit application. Including that at one point a permit was issued but with an incorrect address and presumably for the wrong parking zone.
This is why we submitted an SAR to get sight of all the documents related to all 5 PCNs.
