Free Traffic Legal Advice

OP, I'm trying to simplify this, pl correct if I am wrong. I have not referred to the other PCNs in detail or your repeated attempts to get a response from the council, I have tried to keep things to the bare essentials.

You have received several PCNs for parking at the same location which you believe is not correctly signed.

One of these resulted in your vehicle being removed.

You retrieved your car on 17 Oct. and submitted formal reps to the authority which were delivered on 23rd. October. You have a Royal Mail tracking record in support.

The authority have not responded, you therefore do not have a code which would give you access to the adjudicator.

You have written to the adjudicator setting out the above and asking that your case be listed as an appeal notwithstanding the authority's failure to provide this code.

You have had a response from the adjudicator 'I wrote to them that I wrote an appeal but did not receive a response, they claim that I was late.' but we haven't seen this. Pl post.

In the photo of the letter and envelope you can see my address, but in the reply I painted over my old address from 6 years ago.

So your V5c seems to have the correct name and current address. In which case why would the London Tribunals try to write to you at the old address? I would expect them to respond to the address you put on your Notice of Appeal letter.

The impound receipt also has your correct and current name and address

The Tribunal must have got the old address from Newham. Did you ever give the Council and/or the Tribunal this other old address?

Have you got a Newham parking permit? Perhaps that has an out of date address associated with it?

Yes, this address is 6 years old, I haven’t lived there for a long time! My car has had a different address for a long time, I indicated it twice in the letter.

OP, the Tribunal rejected your application. Put simply, they said that the NOR was issued on 28 Oct. and that your application to the Tribunal was dated 25 May 2025, therefore out of time. This has nothing to do with addresses as such.

It doesn't seem as if they considered that, unlike a 'normal' NOR where ultimately you can access the Tribunal via the Order for Recovery/Witness Statement route, with removals this opportunity does not exist.

I would write back and ask again.

Dear Sir,
PCN **********

I refer to my letter dated *** in which I requested that I be allowed to appeal to an adjudicator against the enforcement authority’s decision to reject my representations in respect the the removal of my vehicle and your letter dated *** refusing my request. As is now clear from your letter, the authority's NOR dated 28th October, about which I was previously unaware, went astray and was not received by me. I was therefore unable to appeal within the statutory time frame.

Whereas for other breakdowns in communication the General Regulations provide a route to an adjudicator via a Witness Statement to the Traffic Enforcement Centre, no such opportunity is afforded in the case of vehicle removals. I am a novice in these matters and unaware that I could have written to you before ** May and it was only by chance that I was given this advice. I therefore wrote to you as early as my personal circumstances allowed.

I would respectfully ask that you reconsider your decision to not register my appeal regarding which I believe I have a compelling case.

Yours

*****

Is the best I can think of.

25.06.2025 i was send more letter

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

25.06.2025 i was send more letter

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

They threaten me every day! They write that at 9:00 pm they will come to seize my property!

I have several letters and then by phone! I have already sued these ****, they blocked my car and asked for 200 ... but when I tried to pay online the amount increased to 300. I had to call the **** and agree on 200. I paid 200 but the **** sent letters that if I paid 100 to some **** and 100 to others, then I still owe them!!! The **** offered me a lawsuit by phone, but I replied we will meet in court! The court did not even mention the 100 for the ****, and I won the lawsuit! Now they do not let me go to court!!! Because my car was parked in a parking lot without a single sign!