Someone suggested this approach may work?? any ideas?
Dear Hackney Council,
I am writing in response to PCN reference [insert reference], which cites contravention code 52M: "Failing to comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicle (motor vehicles)." I conditionally agree to payment if you can supply further clarification and supporting evidence to confirm my liability.
1. Prohibited Vehicles: Please specify which types of vehicles are prohibited under this restriction and which are permitted. Provide the relevant legislation that supports this prohibition.
2. Nature of the Contravention: Is this considered a contravention, offence, or crime? Clarifying the legal basis is essential.
3. Evidence: Can it be verified that the footage or images have not been tampered with, or that fake plates were not used? Additionally, confirm the calibration and accuracy of the cameras involved.
4. Witnesses and Crime Report: Please provide the names of any witnesses and the official crime report related to this alleged contravention. Was any victim identified? Has there been any harm, loss or damage?
5. Legal Justification: The Bill of Rights 1689 clearly states that forfeitures of fines before conviction are null and void. I require confirmation that the enforcement of this fine aligns with both my human rights as protected under the Bill of Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Please clarify whether a court conviction is required in this instance.
6. Liability Order: Kindly provide a copy of the liability order, signed by a judge, as well as any supporting legislation that allows Hackney Council to enforce this fine.
I look forward to your prompt response with the requested information.
