3. Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website  (Read 818 times)

0 Members and 143 Guests are viewing this topic.

Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
« on: »
I have just noticed over the last two days that the infamous Barbour Logic misstates the 28th day when the penalty may increase to £130. Viva Barbour Logic!  :D

Lambeth:

https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/motorbike-52m-pcn-lambeth/msg27420/#msg27420

Southwark point 3 ff:

https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/southwark-council-pcn/msg27334/#msg27334

So it is always worth checking the status of one's PCN before paying or challenging it.  ;)
« Last Edit: June 25, 2024, 08:37:17 am by Hippocrates »
Logged
IF YOU RECEIVE A MOVING TRAFFIC PCN PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE MAKING A REPRESENTATION:

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/moving-traffic-pcns-missing-mandatory-information-the-london-local-authorities-a/msg102639/#msg102639


How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/how-do-we-get-more-people-to-fight-their-pcns/msg41917/#msg41917

If you do not even make a challenge, you will surely join "The Mugged Club".

I am not omniscient. cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

My e mail address for councils:

J.BOND007@H.M.S.S.c/oVAUXHALLBRIDGE/LICENSEDTOEXPOSE.SCAMS.CO.UK

Last mission accomplished:

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/southwark-to-r

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Re: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
« Reply #1 on: »
How would these errors, which do not stand alone but simply conflict with what RKs etc. have already been formally and procedurally notified about, avail them at adjudication especially if the RK has not had an offer of payment
(at the correct level)refused?

It's probably ammunition, but I cannot see it as being a silver bullet.
Logged
Re: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
« Reply #2 on: »
https://bit.ly/2ALghSS

Adjudications key cases  586 ff especially 601
« Last Edit: June 25, 2024, 12:51:49 pm by Hippocrates »
Logged
IF YOU RECEIVE A MOVING TRAFFIC PCN PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE MAKING A REPRESENTATION:

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/moving-traffic-pcns-missing-mandatory-information-the-london-local-authorities-a/msg102639/#msg102639


How do we get more people to fight their PCNs?

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/how-do-we-get-more-people-to-fight-their-pcns/msg41917/#msg41917

If you do not even make a challenge, you will surely join "The Mugged Club".

I am not omniscient. cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

My e mail address for councils:

J.BOND007@H.M.S.S.c/oVAUXHALLBRIDGE/LICENSEDTOEXPOSE.SCAMS.CO.UK

Last mission accomplished:

https://www.ftla.uk/the-flame-pit/southwark-to-r
Re: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
« Reply #3 on: »
@Hippocrates moved this to the flame pit.

Also please note row numbers on the spreadsheet cannot be relied upon, for the simple reason that I keep adding cases all the time so stuff will shift about.
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Re: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
« Reply #4 on: »
Can't get beyond 573 :-\

And I'm reminded of situations which still crop up, although less frequently, which is when an authority includes the actual 14 and 28-day dates in reg. 9 PCNs. Although there were some successes on this point early in the piece, as I recall the consensus view now between the two tribunals is that provided the statutory words or meaning are clearly stated then no PI exists, and this is when 'incorrect' info is actually included in a PCN.
« Last Edit: June 27, 2024, 09:13:21 am by H C Andersen »
Logged
Re: Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website
« Reply #5 on: »
Quote from: H C Andersen on June 27, 2024, 08:32:52 am
Can't get beyond 573 :-\

Not sure what you mean? Can you share a screenshot or a screen recording?
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  3. Moving traffic PCNs and disconnect between the PCN and councils' website