Author Topic: Locus standi to bring a judicial review v a council at the Administrative Court  (Read 74 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Guess which one?  Yes: RBK.

https://www.mylondon.news/news/transport/south-london-driver-plans-legal-33353798

Do the following satisfy locus standi please:

1. Previously worked in the borough at a Public High School for Girls.

2. Previously entertained people pre-Covid in the Market Square and, post-Covid, for charity.

3. Representative of various people v the council in box junctions, bus lane and parking legislations. Two pending cases. Three won at the said location out of three.

4. Liberal Democrat Leader sought my advice re Surbiton Crescent fiasco some 9 years ago which led to them scrapping it.

5. Present council administration (Lib. Dems.)listened to my health and safety concerns re Eden Street Bus lane camera not catching motorcyclists and moved the camera.
« Last Edit: Today at 07:53:44 pm by Hippocrates »
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Broadly speaking, do you have a current interest in the issue, or do you have sufficient standing to bring a claim for the benefit of those that do?

IMHO, #3 is the only one that has any semblance of legs, with #4 and #5 perhaps adding a degree of credibility.

N.B. Nobody outside of the Administrative Court is qualified to answer your question.

The only example I am aware of from personal experience is the Consumers' Association appearing as an interested party in the Supreme Court in Beavis.
I am responsible for the accuracy of the information I post, not your ability to comprehend it.

#5. Pedantically, there is no “present” council. Same council, different administration.

As an RBK resident, I wish you luck.

#5. Pedantically, there is no “present” council. Same council, different administration.

As an RBK resident, I wish you luck.

Corrected. Thanks. Sorry as I have had a tough day on taxi duties between Heathrow and Gatwick and back home and then straight into a review hearing which I won.
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"