Author Topic: Re: Parked in restriced hrs bus lane, Gants Hill, Redbridge  (Read 3178 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Parked in restriced hrs bus lane, Gants Hill, Redbridge
« on: »
Not to hijack the thread, but under what circumstances/criteria would costs be awarded?

Otherwise it's always as per what @Phantomcrusader says above, i.e. for councils, it's either win or nothing to lose.  Surely the adjudicators have acknowledged this?

Or is it the case that if costs were awarded more frequently, councils would accept more reps, less cases would go to tribunal and the adjudicators would be issued a P45.

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Parked in restriced hrs bus lane, Gants Hill, Redbridge
« Reply #1 on: »
I've moved this to the Flame Pit, as it's drifting away from the original topic.

Costs are awarded where the Notice of Rejection is wholly unreasonable, or the the decision by the council to fight the appeal is wholly unreasonable. If you want to explore this in more depth, have a look here for all the cases with the word "costs" in column A.
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order

Re: Parked in restriced hrs bus lane, Gants Hill, Redbridge
« Reply #2 on: »
thank you

Re: Parked in restriced hrs bus lane, Gants Hill, Redbridge
« Reply #3 on: »
@NTIAEP
London Tribunals · londontribunals.gov.uk


And, costs may be awarded even if the council wins. Though, I failed in a recent attempt re a Lewisham case in which they made a statement tantamount to calling me a liar.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2025, 05:47:09 pm by Hippocrates »
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"

Re: Parked in restriced hrs bus lane, Gants Hill, Redbridge
« Reply #4 on: »

Or is it the case that if costs were awarded more frequently, councils would accept more reps, less cases would go to tribunal and the adjudicators would be issued a P45.

You remind me of an earlier me. It's the regulations which need relaxing or changing. The starting point is that the adjudicator will not normally award costs.  See the higher court decisions in the link above.
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"