Author Topic: An MP on the ball  (Read 1113 times)

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

An MP on the ball
« on: »
Drivers should be spared penalty points if they edge over the speed limit in a 20mph zone, according to former Education Secretary Kit Malthouse.

The senior Conservative MP is trying to change the law to help drivers who feel "almost persecuted" by the "explosion" in traffic cameras. Under Mr Malthouse's plans, anyone caught speeding between 20mph and 30mph would not get penalty points but would have to attend a speed awareness course.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/cars/news/new-law-proposed-for-drivers-caught-breaking-uk-20mph-speed-limits/ar-AA1nmrla?ocid=msedgntp&pc=ASTS&cvid=777d3d5154694925ecccb5374e4161a9&ei=11

I wonder if anybody has told Mr Malthouse that courses are already offered up to 31mph and that enforcement is not normally taken below 24mph?

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: An MP on the ball
« Reply #1 on: »
Would that place courses on a statutory footing?
I am not qualified to give legal advice in the UK. While I will do my best to help you, you should not rely on my advice as if it was given by a lawyer qualified in the UK.

Re: An MP on the ball
« Reply #2 on: »
Would that place courses on a statutory footing?
I don't have time to look it up now but I was sure that had already been done?
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order

Re: An MP on the ball
« Reply #3 on: »
Would that place courses on a statutory footing?
I don't have time to look it up now but I was sure that had already been done?

I think it was in the Road Safety Act but I’m not sure if it was ever brought into force.
I am not qualified to give legal advice in the UK. While I will do my best to help you, you should not rely on my advice as if it was given by a lawyer qualified in the UK.

Re: An MP on the ball
« Reply #4 on: »
As for tackling unattended roadworks - there's a simple solution which requires no new legislation (which isn't going to happen).  You just make the company doing the work rent the stretch of road from Highways England.  When HE announce the contract they specify that closed roads/lanes attract a rent of £X per day.

There were overrun penalties since about 2010 for many forms of street works.

I recall reading something earlier this year about increasing them significantly.

I suspect they might be a bit counter productive in that time estimates increase contingency.

Re: An MP on the ball
« Reply #5 on: »
Would that place courses on a statutory footing?
I don't have time to look it up now but I was sure that had already been done?
My understanding of the change I read was it gave them just enough legal basis that there was no longer an argument they were contrary to the fraud act, but gave them no legal status such as akin to a fixed penalty.
There are motorists who have been scammed and those who are yet to be scammed!

Re: An MP on the ball
« Reply #6 on: »
As for tackling unattended roadworks - there's a simple solution which requires no new legislation (which isn't going to happen).  You just make the company doing the work rent the stretch of road from Highways England.  When HE announce the contract they specify that closed roads/lanes attract a rent of £X per day.

There were overrun penalties since about 2010 for many forms of street works.

I recall reading something earlier this year about increasing them significantly.

I suspect they might be a bit counter productive in that time estimates increase contingency.

Attending the works 24/7 will inevitably push up the costs for the highway authority.

So either (1) central government gives the local council more money, thus pushing up taxes, or (2) the council cuts back its road repair programme.

My money is on (2).