Author Topic: Wrong claim number  (Read 635 times)

0 Members and 254 Guests are viewing this topic.

Wrong claim number
« on: »
So im trying to help someone with their claim.

Long story short

They received a claim form dated 5th December 2024, acknowledged it 11th December 2024 (received auto acknowledgment), sent defence on same day BUT made an error with the claim number when sending defence via email. They’ve received a default judgement dated 13th January 2025 and when I asked them to look over what they’ve sent/received, turns out they’ve missed an email from the CNBC asking for the correct claim number as the one they’ve referenced was wrong by one character.

Claim form costs:
Amount claimed: £177.88
Court fee: £35
Legal representative’s court: £50
Total amount: £262.88
Daily interest rate of £0.02 until judgment.

Judgement form costs
£179.32 for debt
£110 for costs
Total: £289.32


Is it worth advicing them to complete the N244 set aside form for this mistake and pay the £303 fee? Also how likely do you think the court will accept the set aside?

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Wrong claim number
« Reply #1 on: »
IMO, it's questionable whether the court would accept the set aside, considering the reason for defence not being submitted properly was entirely on Defendant. Basically, it's "double or quits" considering the amounts.

Re: Wrong claim number
« Reply #2 on: »
That’s what I was thinking as well since the error was from the defendant itself. And whether it is accepted or not theyll still be out of pocket.

Re: Wrong claim number
« Reply #3 on: »
The defendant should carefully consider whether to file an N244 application, as the £303 fee for applying to set aside the judgment is unlikely to be recoverable. The claimant has not acted unreasonably, and unless the defendant can demonstrate that their error (e.g., the incorrect claim number) was unavoidable due to something the claimant did, the court will not order the claimant to cover the fee.

Filing an N244 set aside application for the default judgment is worth considering if the defendant acts promptly and has a realistic prospect of defending the claim. Under CPR 13.3, the court has discretion to set aside a judgment, taking into account the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly, which includes ensuring parties can present their cases fully while avoiding unnecessary costs or delays.

The court will weigh the fairness of allowing the defendant to correct their mistake against the claimant’s right to finality. The error appears inadvertent, and refusing a set aside would unfairly deny the defendant the opportunity to present a potentially strong defence.

The defendant must weigh this cost against the amount of the CCJ (£289.32). Paying the full amount within one calendar month of the judgment (dated 13th January 2025) will result in the CCJ being completely expunged from the record, leaving no trace on credit files. This could be a cheaper and simpler option compared to applying for a set aside, which carries the risk of losing the £303 fee if unsuccessful.

While a set-aside may still be worthwhile if the defence has strong prospects, the cost-benefit analysis should be carefully considered.

Alternatively, the defendant could ask the claimant to consent to a set aside, which would be a cheaper alternative. If the claimant agrees, the court fee for a set aside with consent is only £119, significantly less than the £303 fee for a contested application. However, this route is likely to leave the claim standing, meaning the defendant will need to prepare a defence and potentially face further proceedings.

To pursue this option, the defendant should contact the claimant or their solicitor and request their agreement to set aside the default judgment. If the claimant agrees, ask them to draft a consent order for both parties to sign. This document will outline that both parties consent to setting aside the judgment.

This approach relies on the claimant's cooperation and does not guarantee the outcome of the claim itself. The defendant should weigh this option against paying the CCJ in full within one calendar month of the judgment to have it expunged from the record entirely.
« Last Edit: January 16, 2025, 06:32:28 pm by b789 »
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain
Agree Agree x 1 View List