Author Topic: Premier Parking Enforcement Ltd - Digbeth Court, Birmingham - Not wholly parked within marked bay  (Read 53 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

billboardsigh

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Original letters including overdue payment letter sent to wrong address in September 2024 accusing parking not wholly within marked bay although signage did not explain this. Received letter to my address from Gladstone Solicitors demanding £265 for a PCN which they had sent me no evidence for and the matter was put on hold until March 2025 after MSE template was sent.

Email now received a couple of days ago from Gladstone saying they’re happy to settle with £170 and if payment is not received by March 20th Legal action will be taken.

The car was parked in an end bay with a black van next to it which is nearly out of its own bay. The grey Audi was parked Millimeters out of the white line due to an elderly passenger not able to exit without assistance. Even the front of the car is in line with the front of the black van. When parking there was a large pickup truck not allowing the car to be fully reversed although the truck was not there when evidence was taken.

The only sign in sight did not show ‘park wholly within marked bay’ which there is a photo of. Gladstone sent photo of dirty dingy corner with litter with a sign saying this T&C. The only other signage was covered in graffiti which is useless. Shouldn’t all signs be identical?Gladstone ignored photo of incorrect signage and suggested people should walk around car park and read every sign (shouldn’t have phoned in hindsight).

What are the chances of this case being thrown out? Thinking of just paying so stress is over with. Any help appreciated.

All evidence photos below

https://imgur.com/a/EK7zdy1
« Last Edit: March 12, 2025, 09:32:47 pm by billboardsigh »

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


billboardsigh

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Sorry, here are photos of evidence.

https://imgur.com/a/EK7zdy1

b789

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4244
  • Karma: +188/-5
    • View Profile
    • GullibleTree
I certainly wouldn't worry about a claim issued by the incompetents at Gladstones. I can guarantee that they will fail to comply with CPR 16.4(1)(a) which will mean that the claim is struck out at allocation stage. You do want them to issue a claim as that will be the beginning of the end of this process for you.

Once you receive the claim (N1SDT Claim Form from the CNBC) show us, redacting only your personal information, the claim number and the MCOL password. make sure that everything else remains visible, especially all dates and times. We will provide a suitable defence.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

billboardsigh

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Thank you very much for your help, will let you know when I receive the claim.