Not to worry. You are just one of literally thousands who have been suckered into this well know scam at this location. If you follow the advice, you won't be paying a penny to PPS.
There are several things wrong with the Parking Charge Notice (PCN) that has been issued as a postal Notice to Keeper (NtK). The first one is that it is not fully compliant with all the requirements of PoFA to be able to hold the Keeper liable for the charge. PPS have absolutely no idea who the driver is unless the Keeper blabs it to them, inadvertently or otherwise.
The Keeper and the driver are two separate legal entities and there is no legal obligation on the Keeper to identify the driver. They are not allowed to assume or infer that the Keeper is also the driver. As the Keeper, you should always refer to the driver in the third person. No "I did this or that". Only "The driver did this or that". So, don't tell 'em your name Pike!
Also, the location is NOT Holloway Street but Mattise Road. I have seen PPS provide doctored maps to POPLA to try and con them about this issue.
For now, as PPS will reject any initial appeal, just send the following and wait for the rejection and the POPLA code.
Easy one to deal with… as long as the
unknown drivers identity is not revealed. There is no legal obligation on the
known keeper (the recipient of the Notice to Keeper (NtK)) to reveal the identity of the
unknown driver and no inference or assumptions can be made.
The NtK is not compliant with all the requirements of PoFA which means that if the
unknown driver is not identified, they cannot transfer liability for the charge from the
unknown driver to the
known keeper.
Use the following as your appeal. No need to embellish or remove anything from it:
I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner.
As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions can be drawn. PPS has relied on contract law allegations of breach against the driver only.
The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable. PPS have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.