The operator has chosen not to mention the fact that it is relying on PoFA. It has not said that it can rely on PoFA “subject to all the applicable conditions being met”.
For example, without knowing what is written in the “location” box on the NtK, it could be a location that is ambiguous. In which case, if the fact is raised that the NtK is not PoFA compliant because it does not define the “relevant land”, they could then turn around and just claim that it was not relying on PoFA.
BTW, OP, what does it say in the “location” box on the NtK? Could you enter the contents of that box into Google maps and it comes up with more than one possible location?
Whilst this is an IPC operator, I have little to no faith that the IAS would view the above scenario favourably, unlike a recent POPLA appeal that won on exactly that argument. However, should this ever get to court, it could be a winning argument.
What is written as the “location”?