Free Traffic Legal Advice

That is good evidence of their mendacious behaviour. There does not appear to have ever been an entrance sign at this location. If there is one now, take a photo of it.

They will be required to provide evidence of an entrance sign at the location prior to the date of the alleged contravention. As can be seen in GSV, there was no sign in place in March 2023 and no sign ij place on the date you took your photos.

This one will be easy to challenge in a claim and it will be interesting to see whether BW Legal are prepared to let their client take this all the way to a hearing, where they will be in danger of a spanking and a cost order for unreasonable behaviour.

I can't believe how any reasonable person from the IAS dismissed the appeal in the first place!

Trying to upload images via insert image link but it's not working?

For me, every single one of these links is the same thing.

However, although I can’t view them, no, you do not complete any forms. Whatever they are requesting from you is none of their business.

You simply send a reply to the Letter of Claim.

Will re-upload! seems like the link function / image upload function is being a little glitchy


THANK YOU!

Posting multiple images doesn't seem to work for me so will post them individually:

Evidence pack I used of operator's photos of car and warning signs on wall -

3:

And screenshot of adjudicator's decision:

I have found

from r/bristol

thread (archived link) on Reddit, pertaining to 'Forbidding Signs'.

Guess whose signage it is?

In court, I claimed that as the sign was an absolute prohibition on parking no contract for parking could be entered into, in order to enter into a contract the sign needs to OFFER parking for £100, it can't say "no parking, but if you park here you pay £100 for parking". It's called a "forbidding contract" and it's a legal nonsense ... the judge agreed with me and [threw] the case out,

And a starter for ten in terms of a relevant judgment from a different case, involving a different but similar sign.
https://www.parkingcowboys.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/UKPC-v-MASTERSON-Judgment.pdf

So I would say the argument here is twofold; firstly, that the signage was not adequate but secondly, and most importantly, the signs are not an offer, and therefore there was no acceptance, and therefore there was no contract even if the place had been littered with them.