Author Topic: ParkingEye ticket in Perth, Scotland, for alleged supermarket overstay  (Read 910 times)

0 Members and 70 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hello,
I received a Parking Eye letter for an alleged overstay in a supermarket carpark in Perth, Scotland, by the driver of a car of which I am the registered keeper.

Should I ignore?

Documents attached.

Thanks in advance for advice on this!

DJ

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


In Scotland, there is no "keeper liability"... for now. Thanks to the corrupt 'dear leader', when the Private Parking (Code of Practice) Act 2019 comes into force, it will also apply to Scotland, thus removing one more protection.

The only way that PE could know the identity of the driver is if the known keeper tells them, inadvertently or otherwise. Do not under any circumstances identify the unknown driver.

So, ParkingEye have no idea who the driver is. The driver is unknown. All they know is the keeper details. The keeper is known. As PoFA does not apply in Scotland and there is no keeper liability, for now, what do you think they can do?

You can either ignore the PCN or simply appeal as the keeper, with the following:

I appeal as keeper. I am not obliged to identify the driver and I decline to do so. You are unable to transfer the driver’s liability (if any) to me because the location in question is in Scotland and you will be well aware that Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) does not apply north of the border, for now. Therefore there can be no keeper liability.

I require you to cancel the notice or issue a POPLA code to the driver. Do not issue me, the keeper, a POPLA code as I will ignore it because, as you know, only the driver, not the keeper, can use POPLA in Scotland.
« Last Edit: July 14, 2024, 11:27:47 am by b789 »
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

when the Private Parking (Code of Practice) Act 2019 comes into force, it will also apply to Scotland, thus removing one more protection.

Only if the ministers sets out the requirements in line with that, the minister can still decide NOT to do that.
There are motorists who have been scammed and those who are yet to be scammed!