Author Topic: ParkingEye - DirectSports  (Read 97 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

JohnBravo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Location: East Midlands, UK
    • View Profile
ParkingEye - DirectSports
« on: December 04, 2024, 11:56:24 pm »
Hi,
 I had a pleasure with Parking Eye in the past.
Now they sent me a ticket for paid private parking. It seems they have a working camera but payment machine isn't working but I don't have an evidence the machine was faulty.
Basically one button to type in the number plate was abused to the point it didn't work.

Where can I find the right email address or address to mail Sports Direct a request to cancel the ticket?

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


DWMB2

  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2337
  • Karma: +66/-1
    • View Profile
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2024, 12:01:38 am »
If you would like help with any appeals, please read the following thread carefully and provide as much of the information it asks for as you are able to: READ THIS FIRST - Private Parking Charges Forum guide

Where can I find the right email address or address to mail Sports Direct a request to cancel the ticket?
We don't maintain a database of landowner/retailer details. If you're able to visit the store in question and speak to a manager that's a good starting point. If not, see what you can find on Google.
Away 10/01/25 - 18/01/25 - I will have limited forum access

Posting for the first time? READ THIS FIRST - Private Parking Charges Forum guide | House Rules

Useful Links (for private parking charges):
Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) Schedule 4 | Private Parking Sector Single Code of Practice
Like Like x 1 View List

JohnBravo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Location: East Midlands, UK
    • View Profile
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2024, 05:39:42 pm »
I was mistaken, it's not ParkingEye but CP Plus Limited.
I think while I was reading this letter I saw ParkingEye vs Beavis mentioned and my faulty brain just picked it up.

I have contacted DirectSports and they did come back to me saying it's not their land apparently.

mickR

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 511
  • Karma: +9/-1
    • View Profile
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2024, 07:00:54 pm »
and all the relevant info ???

JohnBravo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Location: East Midlands, UK
    • View Profile
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2024, 06:21:40 pm »
Apologies for not attaching the actual letter.



b789

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
  • Karma: +133/-4
    • View Profile
    • GullibleTree
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2024, 09:20:36 pm »
That's the reminder. We need to see the original Notice to Keeper (NtK) making sure that all dates and times remain visible.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

JohnBravo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Location: East Midlands, UK
    • View Profile
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2025, 05:55:56 am »
Apologies but been ill for all this time.



b789

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
  • Karma: +133/-4
    • View Profile
    • GullibleTree
Re: ParkingEye - DirectSports
« Reply #7 on: January 10, 2025, 12:19:03 pm »
You can appeal that the Notice to Keeper (NtK) is not fully complaint with ALL the requirements of PoFA and therefore the Keeper cannot be liable. CP Plus have no idea of the drivers identity unless the Keeper bias it to them, inadvertently or otherwise.

There is no legal obligation on the Keeper to identify the driver to an unregulated private parking company.

The PoFA failure is that there is no clear invitation for the Keeper to pay the charge. There has to be a clear "invitation" or at least a synonym of the word, for the Keeper to pay the charge. Inference is not enough. CP Plus will reject any appeal. Unfortunately, POPLA assessors are moronic when it comes to this argument and conveniently ignoring subsection (i) of Paragraph 9(2)(e) of PoFA.

As long as the unknown drivers identity is not revealed. There is no legal obligation on the known keeper (the recipient of the Notice to Keeper (NtK)) to reveal the identity of the unknown driver and no inference or assumptions can be made.

The NtK is not compliant with all the requirements of PoFA which means that if the unknown driver is not identified, they cannot transfer liability for the charge from the unknown driver to the known keeper.

Use the following as your appeal. No need to embellish or remove anything from it:

Quote
I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner.

As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions can be drawn. Horizon has relied on contract law allegations of breach against the driver only.

The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable. Horizon have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.

Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain
Like Like x 1 View List