Author Topic: Parking Eye billing effort for alleged event in Scotland 15 months ago  (Read 1123 times)

0 Members and 25 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hi again everyone. I have today received a communication from Direct Collection Bailiffs, who say their client is Parking Eye, in relation to an alleged parking event that took place in the car park of Asda's supermarket in Perth, Scotland, in July 2024.

This is not the same as the event that is the subject of this other thread, which allegedly occurred in England.

I was the keeper of the car on the date of the alleged incident. There has been, and there will be, no identification of the driver.

Notable features this time are as follows:

1. This refers to an "unpaid parking charge", but it is the first communication I have received about this - some 15 months after the alleged parking incident. As you can see, they include the BPA logo on their communication, so presumably they are obliged to play by BPA rules. What's the time limit? Surely it's less than 15 months?

2. They clearly say on their document that liability in Scotland falls on the driver. It's interesting that they haven't even asked me whether I know who the driver was, yet they are still threatening to "recommend" to their client the "commencement of legal action" against me.

3. I would be interested to know when they got my name and address as keeper, and whether they got it from the DVLA or from somewhere else.

4. Note the absence of

a. any reference to the alleged time of the incident;
b. any reference to what the contravention allegedly was, other than that it allegedly involved "remaining";
c. photographs.



« Last Edit: October 21, 2025, 02:45:02 pm by carriep »

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Parking Eye billing effort for alleged event in Scotland 15 months ago
« Reply #1 on: »
DCBL can be ignored, but if anyone else contacts you (DCB Legal, say) then you can ignore them or remind them that keeper liability does not apply in Scotland and you won’t be identifying the driver.

Re: Parking Eye billing effort for alleged event in Scotland 15 months ago
« Reply #2 on: »
Are you a Scottish resident?

DCBL are irrelevant. They did not issue the PCN. They did not request your details from the DVLA. DCBL are just a powerless and useless debt collector and and are not a party to any contract allegedly breached by the driver. They only power is to try and intimidate the low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree into paying out of ignorance and fear. You can safely shred anything from DCBL and use it as Hamster bedding for all anyone cares. Ignore DCBL.

Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA), Keeper liability applies only in England and Wales. This means that if a vehicle is allegedly involved in a parking contravention in Scotland, the registered keeper cannot be held liable for the charge unless they were identified as the actual driver at the time of the contravention. The only way they would know the drivers identity is if the Keeper blabs it to them, inadvertently or otherwise. Don't tell 'em your name Pike!

Nothing is going to happen. Ignore everything unless they send a Letter of Claim (LoC), which, if they were to issue a claim, t=would be unlawful.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Parking Eye billing effort for alleged event in Scotland 15 months ago
« Reply #3 on: »
Are you a Scottish resident?
Yes, and this incident allegedly took place in Scotland too, unlike the other one.

Re: Parking Eye billing effort for alleged event in Scotland 15 months ago
« Reply #4 on: »
The vice given above does not change. Get on with your life. Nothing is going to happen.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain