Author Topic: N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd  (Read 272 times)

0 Members and 122 Guests are viewing this topic.

N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« on: »
Hi B789 & Richard W

I hope you are both well and Happy New Year!

I have come across your very useful advice on this forum post.

I was hoping you could give me some advice as I have received an N1DST from the Courts for DCBL Legal on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd (Issue date 22/12/2025) and know that I now need to act to avoid any potentially risk of a default CCJ.

For background:
This PC claim first came to my knowledge when I received a letter from DCBL on 24/10/2025 in relation to an alleged infringement on 18/05/2024 at a Smart Parking car park. FYI - I moved house in June 2024 and updated by licence but forgot to update the V5C unfortunately.

As this was the first I had heard about this PC, I challenged it using the online tool on the Smart Parking website letting them know I would like some evidence of the infringement and told them this is the first I have heard about it - They replied with two images (one entering and one leaving the car park) and said that I didn't pay for long enough for the duration stayed. They said it was too late to challenge and that it had been passed to DCBL and I had to deal with them directly. - I ignored the DCBL letter.

I then received a second letter from DCBL Legal this time on 13/11/25 again demanding £150 and the usually threatening language - I ignored also.

On 29/12/2025 I received a N1DST claim form from the courts with the issue date of 22/12/2025. Now requesting a claim of £251.56 (Claim: £166.66, court fee: £35 & legal costs:£50).

I honestly can't remember the day and the duration spent at the parking location but I have no intention of paying these crooks £250 but I know I have 14 days now to do something - so I was hoping you could provide me with some advice on how to proceed.

I have attached a link to the N1DST with PoCs for your reference.

https://thumbnail-img-4342.tiiny.site


I look forward to your response and many thanks in advance.

Matt

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Split from Hijack: Filling in a N1SDT form.
« Reply #1 on: »
So did you submit an AoS as advised above?

Quote
With an issue date of 10th December, you have until 4pm on Monday 29th December to submit your defence. If you submit an Acknowledgement of Service (AoS) before then, you would then have until 4pm on Monday 12th January to submit your defence.

You only need to submit an AoS if you need extra time to prepare your defence. If you want to submit an AoS then follow the instructions in this linked PDF:
If not, did you submit the defence suggested above in Reply #4?

Tell us what you’ve done, not done, and where you’re at in the process!
« Last Edit: January 03, 2026, 12:49:51 pm by jfollows »

N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« Reply #2 on: »
Hi, I hope you are all well and Happy New Year!


I have come across this forum in relation to dealing with DCBL/DCBL Legal.

I was hoping to get some advice as I have received an N1DST from the Courts for DCBL Legal on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd (Issue date 22/12/2025) and know that I now need to act to avoid any potentially risk of a default CCJ.

For background:
This PC claim first came to my knowledge when I received a letter from DCBL on 24/10/2025 in relation to an alleged infringement on 18/05/2024 at a Smart Parking car park. FYI - I moved house in June 2024 and updated by licence but forgot to update the V5C unfortunately.

As this was the first I had heard about this PC, I challenged it using the online tool on the Smart Parking website letting them know I would like some evidence of the infringement and told them this is the first I have heard about it - They replied with two images (one entering and one leaving the car park) and said that I didn't pay for long enough for the duration stayed. They said it was too late to challenge and that it had been passed to DCBL and I had to deal with them directly. - I ignored the DCBL letter.

I then received a second letter from DCBL Legal this time on 13/11/25 again demanding £150 and the usually threatening language - I ignored also.

On 29/12/2025 I received a N1DST claim form from the courts with the issue date of 22/12/2025. Now requesting a claim of £251.56 (Claim: £166.66, court fee: £35 & legal costs:£50).

I honestly can't remember the day and the duration spent at the parking location but I know I have 14 days now to do something - so I was hoping the forum could provide me with some advice on how to proceed.

I have attached a link to the N1DST with PoCs for your reference.

https://thumbnail-img-4342.tiiny.site


Re: N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« Reply #3 on: »
A letter before claim should not be ignored, it is a chance to show that you are not an easy touch.

Did you identify the driver in any correspondence to smart?

Re: N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« Reply #4 on: »
Hi Dave,

In my chain of events isn’t fully accurate I did call up DCBL and say I would challenge directly with Smart parking as I never received the original PCN.

What do you mean by identify the driver to Smart? I can tell it’s me from the pictures they sent but I didn’t confirm it was me driving.

Re: N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« Reply #5 on: »
What do you mean by identify the driver to Smart? I can tell it’s me from the pictures they sent but I didn’t confirm it was me driving.
Nobody can identify the driver from pictures, think about it. The only way they know who the driver is is if you tell them explicitly.

Re: N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« Reply #6 on: »
Ok understood, so how do I proceed?

Re: N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« Reply #7 on: »
This forum will help you.
First do a search on this site(top box) for Smart posts and DCBL legal, b789 has very good advice with these.

b789`s usual advice is that they will most likely discontinue the claim.

Re: N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« Reply #8 on: »
If the OP were to defend on the basis of putting the PPC to proof that he was the driver, and they have photos that clearly show the OP driving, a District Judge might well be able to identify him from those photos or otherwise ask him if he was the driver.
I am responsible for the accuracy of the information I post, not your ability to comprehend it.

Re: N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« Reply #9 on: »
Thanks Dave/Andy, I also noted b789’s advice on here.

Would it be appropriate to use the same defence b789 provided on this thread?

https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/filling-in-a-n1sdt-form/?topicseen



Re: Split from Hijack: Filling in a N1SDT form.
« Reply #10 on: »
It looks like @Bakery55 is hijacking someone else’s post, apologies. This needs to be in its own thread.
« Last Edit: January 04, 2026, 01:39:06 pm by jfollows »

Re: Split from Hijack: Filling in a N1SDT form.
« Reply #11 on: »
Sorry new to the forum, I have launched a new post not trying to ‘hijack’ anything.

Re: N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« Reply #12 on: »
Thanks Dave/Andy, I also noted b789’s advice on here.

Would it be appropriate to use the same defence b789 provided on this thread?

https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/filling-in-a-n1sdt-form/?topicseen

Given this is a DCBL claim with their usual poor POC, then yes, b789's defence in the linked thread looks appropriate.

Re: N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« Reply #13 on: »
Hi all,

I have submitted my defence and now DCBL are trying to call me nonstop - surely this isn’t normal for the judicial process?

Re: N1DST received DCBL on behalf of Smart Parking Ltd
« Reply #14 on: »
Just block their number... they want to strong arm you into paying something out of court - since they know they will lose / discontinue the case and get nothing.