Free Traffic Legal Advice

Can you post up the PCN redacting only personal info.

Where is the location?

Anything on the back?

I don't think you will be able to argue the 5 minutes consideration period, that's in the code of practice unless you can successfully argue the car park is big enough to warrant a longer consideration period. The ntk is quite vague about the location, it gives a postcode but that's quite an area and covers at least 2 separate car parks, this could be a defence point meaning the the ntk is is not POFA compliant. I'd change your original post as you've clearly identified the driver. The driver should always be referred to in the 3rd party.

Trouble is I Park are IPC members and as such neither they or IAS are likely to grant your appeal. They will probably give up around the time they have to pay the court fee but that will be after the debt collectors letters which can be ignored and eventually an LOC which can't be ignored.

The NtK does not appear to be compliant with Schedule 4 Paragraph 9(2)(f) which requires that the NtK;

warn the keeper... blah blah blah... the creditor will, if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met, have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid;


The warning that 'the parking operator must meet the conditions of schedule 4' is missing from the NtK - this is mandatory wording.