That NtK is pretty much PoFA compliant except for paragraph 9(2)(a) because it does not state the period of parking, only a moment in time. However, that point is moot if you have already revealed the drivers identity.
What did you put in your appeals? You'll need to show us exactly what was said in order to assess whether PCMUK have anything to counter an argument that you were there at the location for less than the consideration period and whether the signage was adequate to bring the charge to the notice of the driver.
How was the contract formed? If the only signage was prohibitory, it is impossible to form a contract.
Your other advantage is that if Moorside Legal are handing the claim, they will, I can guarantee, screw up the claim and you will likely be able to have the claim struck out before it ever get sot a hearing.
I appealled as the keeper of the vehicle. no admitted and never disclosure the identy of driver.
In the IAS appeal Parking Control Management UK ltd. just said the vehicle go through the area over 4 mins.
absolutely less than the consideration period.
But the PCN is Parked within a restricted area. not entering .
The signage is at the side of the road below eye level.
I hope you will find this is definitely rough PCN with no evidence.
But they have big mouth !
I will send you the letter of reject and my IAS appeal document.
Thank you for your attention to this matter again !
Have a lovely weekend.
