Author Topic: Group Nexus Parking Charge  (Read 803 times)

0 Members and 120 Guests are viewing this topic.

Group Nexus Parking Charge
« on: »
Hi All,

I received a parking charge for a vehicle in my name recently for an overstay during a no parking time, and I sent GroupNexus the below letter that I found on this forum.
The ticket was for staying for 30 minutes past 22:30, which is when the car park was closed.
They have now responded asking for the driver details, but no clear message as to if they will provide the information I requested. Please could anyone advise me on what step I should take next.

The letter I sent:

Without prejudice, except as to costs
This letter is a formal challenge to the issue of your Parking Charge Notice - Notice to Keeper as set out in the current BPA Ltd AOS Code of Practice B.22 On xx/xx/2025 I was the registered keeper of a xxxxxx, registration number xxxxxx.

Before I decide how to deal with your Parking Charge Notice - Notice to Keeper, I should be grateful if you would first answer all the questions and deal with all the issues I have set out below. Once you have done so, I will be able to make an informed decision on how I deal with the matter. I should be grateful for specific answers to all questions raised. In this respect I remind you of the obligations set out in the current Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct. I dispute your claim for the reasons set out below.

Please note that although I dispute the whole basis of the parking charge, my main concern is its disproportionate and punitive level.

1. Your parking charge amount claim. Please explain on which of the following grounds your claim is based: (i) Damages for trespass (ii) Damages for breach of contract (iii) A contractual sum

2. Your loss. If it is your case that that a trespass was committed or that a contract was breached such that your claim is one for damages; please give me a full breakdown of the actual losses which evidences that this parking charge is a true reflection of the damages caused solely by the alleged parking contravention.

3. Your status – the creditor. Your Parking Charge Notice - Notice to Keeper simply mentions ‘CP Plus Ltd. T/A GroupNexus’. Please tell me who is the actual creditor making this £100 parking charge demand.
I need to know exactly who is making the claim and in what capacity.

4. Ownership of premises. Please tell me who owns the car park as I wish to send them a copy of this letter.

5. Contractual Authority (as required by BPA Ltd AOS CoP B.7)
Please provide me with a copy of the contract between your company and the landowner/landholder that provides the necessary contractual written authority for the issue and enforcement of your Parking Charge Notice - Notice to Keeper.

6. Signage. If it is your case that a contract has been breached or that a contractual sum is now due, please send me photographs of the signs that you display and upon which you seek to evidence that a lawful and legally enforceable contract was been entered into. Please ensure that the photographs show the terms and conditions in a clear and legible manner, which should be legible during night time when the alleged offence occurred. Please provide me with a diagram showing the locations and layout of those signs at the car park. Also provide evidence that the wording is in plain and intelligible language and in sufficiently large print as to be legible to a driver at the car park’s entry point.

7. Summary I look forward to receiving your acknowledgement within 14 days and as there are no ‘exceptional circumstances’ your comprehensive reply within 35 days (in accordance with the BPA AOS Code of Practice B.22.8). I will then be able to make an informed decision as to how I deal with your Parking Charge Notice – Notice to Keeper.

If you reject this challenge or fail to address the issues that have been raised then, in accordance with the BPA AOS Code of Practice 22.12, please ensure that you enclose all the required information (including the necessary ‘POPLA code’) so that I may immediately refer the matter for their decision. If you fail to follow any of the procedures outlined in the BPA AOS Code of Practice or your legal requirements under the Protection of Freedoms Act, or the requirements of the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct then I will make a formal complaint to the DVLA Data Sharing Policy Group, D16. Please Note: Unless you have specifically requested it and received my express permission, you do not have my authority to disclose or refer this letter or any other communication from me to any other person or organisation.


Their Response:
Thank you for your correspondence relating to your Parking Charge.
The representations stated in your correspondence have been noted and considered. Please forward to us the full name and address of the driver at the time this charge was incurred so that we can update our records accordingly.
We are placing this Charge on hold for 14 days from the date of this email to allow you to provide the details requested.



Thank you for your help and time.

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Group Nexus Parking Charge
« Reply #1 on: »
Where on earth did you dig that response out from? The BPA CoP was replaced with the PPSCoP over a year ago and has since been updated.

Anyway, you are under no legal obligation to identify the driver and you must not do so. However, we would need to see the original Notice to Keeper (NtK), both sides, to know whether their notice is PoFA 2012 compliant. Only redact your personal information, the PCN number and your car VRM. Leave ALL dates and times visible.


Once we've seen that, we can provide a suitable response, although it does not really need responding to. Personally, if it were me, I would simply refer them to the answer given in Arkell v Pressdram (1971).
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Group Nexus Parking Charge
« Reply #2 on: »
Hi, thanks for your response, I will not be sending any driver details to them.
Please see the link below for the notice to keeper.
https://imgur.com/a/cmvzxkd

Below is the sign displayed in the car park.
https://imgur.com/a/TA9CRAF

Thanks again for your time.

Arkell v Pressdram (1971) Seems quite good
« Last Edit: September 17, 2025, 10:09:00 pm by ClassicCars »

Re: Group Nexus Parking Charge
« Reply #3 on: »
More importantly, what driver facing signs are there at the entrance? From the limited GSV images, I don't see any entrance signs that face the driver informing them they are entering private land with terms and conditions. One on a gate or a wall, when open that is at 90º to the driver doesn't count.

Anyway, the NtK is not PoFA compliant. They are not even relying on PoFA.

Easy one to deal with… as long as the unknown drivers identity is not revealed. There is no legal obligation on the known keeper (the recipient of the Notice to Keeper (NtK)) to reveal the identity of the unknown driver and no inference or assumptions can be made.

The NtK is not compliant with all the requirements of PoFA which means that if the unknown driver is not identified, they cannot transfer liability for the charge from the unknown driver to the known keeper.

Use the following as your appeal. No need to embellish or remove anything from it:

Quote
I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner.

As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions can be drawn. GroupNexus has relied on contract law allegations of breach against the driver only.

The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable. GroupNexus have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain