Have Elms responded to all the requests made int he response to the loC as required by the PAP? If not and their misconduct with the re-issuance of the LoC can all be mentioned on the form CILEx are asking you to complete. I've already explained what the problem is with Elms.
Otherwise, you are waiting for the claim to arrive which can be dealt with as and when.
They haven't bothered to answer the questions explicitly, just sent a load of images and docs
I think 1, 2, 4 are answered by the original PCN and the terms on the main car park sign.
3. I can't find any reference to Schedule 4 of POFA 2012 anywhere
5. Is the claim for a contractual breach: I don't know - just seems to be contravention of terms stated on the sign.
6. If the claim is for a contractual breach, photographs showing the vehicle was parked in contravention of said contract. Photos showing entering & leaving, but not parked.
7. Is the claim for trespass? Not stated
9. plan provided
10. Photographs of the signs displayed: photos provided but not size of sign, font, height displayed.
11. Provide details of the original charge/interest/admin or other charges: not explicitly stated
12. The additional £70: According to the sign it's a "collection fee on an indemnity basis for costs incurred as a result of debt/legal recovery". Not stated anywhere whether it includes VAT.
13. The principal alleged PCN sum: According to the sign, it's clearly consideration for parking: £100 per day or part day
Now they've sent me a copy of my appeal, I can see that I said my son pressed the wrong button. Having spoken to him since, he said he didn't seem to be able to enter the full reg number. Is that likely to cause me a problem?
I'll start filling in the Misconduct Information Form...
