Author Topic: DCBL notice of intended legal action  (Read 5692 times)

0 Members and 945 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #15 on: »
DCB Legal get a lot of stick on this forum, but if any of their staff ever get bored of life in Runcorn, they could have a glittering career in politics. They've got question dodging nailed.

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #16 on: »
Thank you so much for your help i will send this over right away 🙏

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #17 on: »
Good evening, i have now received another letter by post and this time a notice of enforcement.

Please see attached

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #18 on: »
That better has absolutely nothing to do with the ECP PCN we are dealing with.

It appear to be for a completely different case involving a council issued PCN issued under statutory law.

I suggest you get yourself sorted as there are two completely separate issues here and we are only dealing with the ECP PCN.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #19 on: »
Oh gosh, i have had a very long day, this car was sold and that’s the new keepers ticket i shall forward them his details

Sorry for wasting your time

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #20 on: »
I have very little knowledge of the council process but a Warrant of Control may give them the right to seize your goods. You may be sensible to post about that notice in the council section of this forum.

Simply passing on details of the new keeper may not be enough.

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #21 on: »
Thank you for your advice i will do so now, happy easter

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #22 on: »
@DWMB2, good advice.

OP, this Notice of Enforcement gives the addressee 7 clear days to pay the debt beginning on the date of service. So there is time, but not much.

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #23 on: »
Take down the first page with the password and redact that.
you have a few days to acknowledge the claim and to defend in full but do not put anything into the defence, which will be completed with assistance of others here.

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #24 on: »
Hi,
Thank you for your reply.

I dont understand what password to redact i have looked at all the pages and cant see a password ?

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #25 on: »
Hi i have received a letter from HM courts and tribunal service, please advice what i should do next

Hi Sue, your password is on the second image, that's what should be redacted, as well as the Claim number.

I have the exact same form arrive today, for a DCBL claim too. This this fine was sent for allegedly spending more than the allocated time in the petrol station whilst i waited to wash my car.

I will wait for the advice given to you. Although i have submitted my AOS.

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #26 on: »
I've deleted your posts with the password showing. Below is the page we need to see, with relevant info redacted:


Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #27 on: »
With an issue date of 20th May, you have until 4pm on Monday 9th June to submit your defence. If you submit an Acknowledgement of Service (AoS) before then, you would then have until 4pm on Monday 23rd June to submit your defence.

If you want to submit an AoS then follow the instructions in this linked PDF:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xvqu3bask5m0zir/money-claim-online-How-to-Acknowledge.pdf?dl=0

Otherwise, here is the defence and link to the draft order that goes with it. You only need to edit your name and the claim number. You sign the defence by typing your full name for the signature and date it. There is nothing to edit in the draft order.

When you're ready you combine both documents as a single PDF attachment and send as an attachment in an email to claimresponses.cnbc@justice.gov.uk and CC in yourself. The claim number must be in the email subject field and in the body of the email just put: "Please find attached the defence and draft order in the matter of Euro Car Parks Ltd v [your full name] Claim no.: [claim number]."

Quote
IN THE COUNTY COURT
Claim No: [Claim Number]

BETWEEN:

Euro Car Parks Ltd

Claimant

- and -

[Defendant's Full Name]


Defendant



DEFENCE

1. The Defendant denies the claim in its entirety. The Defendant asserts that there is no liability to the Claimant and that no debt is owed. The claim is without merit and does not adequately disclose any comprehensible cause of action.

2. There is a lack of precise detail in the Particulars of Claim (PoC) in respect of the factual and legal allegations made against the Defendant such that the PoC do not comply with CPR 16.4.

3. The Defendant is unable to plead properly to the PoC because:

(a) The contract referred to is not detailed or attached to the PoC in accordance with CPR PD 16(7.5);

(b) The PoC do not state the exact wording of the clause (or clauses) of the terms and conditions of the contract (or contracts) which is/are relied on;

(c) The PoC do not adequately set out the reason (or reasons) why the claimant asserts the defendant has breached the contract (or contracts)

(d) The PoC do not state with sufficient particularity exactly where the breach occurred, the exact time when the breach occurred and how long it is alleged that the vehicle was parked before the parking charge was allegedly incurred;

(e) The PoC do not state precisely how the sum claimed is calculated, including the basis for any statutory interest, damages, or other charges;

(f) The PoC do not state what proportion of the claim is the parking charge and what proportion is damages;

(g) The PoC do not provide clarity on whether the Defendant is sued as the driver or the keeper of the vehicle, as the claimant cannot plead alternative causes of action without specificity.

4. The Defendant attaches to this defence a copy of a draft order approved by a district judge at another court. The court struck out the claim of its own initiative after determining that the Particulars of Claim failed to comply with CPR 16.4. The judge noted that the claimant had failed to:

(i) Set out the exact wording of the clause (or clauses) of the terms and conditions relied upon;

(ii) Adequately explain the reasons why the defendant was allegedly in breach of contract;

(iii) Provide separate, detailed Particulars of Claim as permitted under CPR PD 7C.5.2(2).

(iv) The court further observed that, given the modest sum claimed, requiring further case management steps would be disproportionate and contrary to the overriding objective. Accordingly, the judge struck out the claim outright rather than permitting an amendment.

5. The Defendant submits that the same reasoning applies in this case and invites the court to adopt a similar approach by striking out the claim for the Claimant’s failure to comply with CPR 16.4.

Statement of truth

I believe that the facts stated in this Defence are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.

Signed:


Date:

Draft Order for the defence
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #28 on: »
Thank you for your time i really appreciate it appreciate it, i have sent the email over with the defence and draft

Have a great bank holiday weekend
Sue

Re: DCBL notice of intended legal action
« Reply #29 on: »
Sorry, i have received another letter just this afternoon from DCB legal. Just wanted to add that on here just incase it’s relevant

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]