Author Topic: UKPC – Overstay parking charge – McDonald's, Ardwick, Manchester  (Read 1889 times)

0 Members and 178 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: UKPC – Overstay parking charge – McDonald's, Ardwick, Manchester
« Reply #15 on: »
Either way, it really does not matter. The POPLA decisions not binding on you and has no bearing on anything going forward.

I will place a £100 bet that if you follow the advice, this will pan out as follows...

You ignore all the useless debt recovery letters as the debt collectors are powerless to actually do anything except to try and make the low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree pay up out of ignorance and fear. You can safely ignore all DRA letters and we don't need to know about them.

Eventually, you will receive a Letter of Claim from DCB Legal which you should show us and after that, an N1SDT Claim Form from the CNBC, which must be responded to.

After defending the claim, it will eventually be struck out or discontinued.

You may want to complain to POPLA about the mention of some unrelated name in their appeal rejection. It raises the possibility that the assessor was looking at the wrong appeal when making their assessment.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: UKPC – Overstay parking charge – McDonald's, Ardwick, Manchester
« Reply #16 on: »
DCB Legal have finally decided to send out their letter




« Last Edit: October 16, 2025, 07:56:59 pm by fafner »

Re: UKPC – Overstay parking charge – McDonald's, Ardwick, Manchester
« Reply #17 on: »
Send the following email in response to info@dcblegal.co.uk and CC yourself:

Quote
Subject: Response to your Letter of Claim Ref: [reference number]

Dear Sirs,

Your Letter Before Claim contains insufficient detail of the claim and fails to provide copies of the evidence your client places reliance upon, putting it in clear breach of the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims.

As a supposed firm of solicitors, one would expect you to comply with paragraphs 3.1(a)–(d), 5.1 and 5.2 of the Protocol, and paragraphs 6(a) and 6(c) of the Practice Direction. These provisions exist to facilitate informed discussion and proportionate resolution. You may wish to reacquaint yourselves with them.

The Civil Procedure Rules 1998, Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols (Part 3), require the exchange of sufficient information to understand each other’s position. Part 6 clarifies that this includes disclosure of key documents relevant to the issues in dispute.

Your template letter refers to a “contract” yet encloses none. That omission undermines the only foundation upon which your client’s claim allegedly rests. It is not possible to engage in meaningful pre-litigation dialogue while you decline to furnish the very document you purport to enforce.

I confirm that, once I am in receipt of a Letter Before Claim that complies with para 3.1(a), I shall seek advice and submit a formal response within 30 days, as required. Accordingly, please provide:

1. A copy of the original Notice to Keeper (NtK) and any notice chain relied upon to assert PoFA 2012 liability.

2. A copy of the contract you allege exists between your client and the driver, being an actual photograph of the sign(s) in place on the material date (not a stock image), together with a site plan showing the sign locations.

3. The precise wording of the clause(s) allegedly breached.

4. The written agreement between your client and the landowner evidencing standing/authority to enforce and to litigate.

5. A breakdown of the sums claimed, identifying whether the principal sum is claimed as consideration or damages, and whether the £70 “debt recovery” add-on includes VAT.


I am entitled to this information under paragraphs 6(a) and 6(c) of the Practice Direction, and I require it to meet my own obligation under paragraph 6(b).

If you fail to provide the above, I will treat that as non-compliance with the PAPDC and Pre-Action Conduct and will raise a formal complaint to the SRA regarding your conduct. I reserve the right to place this correspondence before the Court and to seek appropriate sanctions and costs (including, where appropriate, a stay and/or other case management orders).

Until your client complies and provides the requested material, I am unable to respond properly to the alleged claim or to consider my position. It would be premature and a waste of costs and court time to issue proceedings. Should you do so, I will seek immediate case management relief pursuant to paragraph 15(b) of the Practice Direction and an order compelling provision of the above.

Please note, I will not engage with any web portal; I will only respond by email or post.

Yours faithfully,

[Your name]
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain