Author Topic: Bank Parking - compensation for ticket being issued incorrectly.  (Read 4250 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Bank Parking - compensation for ticket being issued incorrectly.
« Reply #15 on: »
A further update

We issued a SAR previously.

We didn’t get a response as such to the SAR but did get the following email response;-

“Good Afternoon,
 
This PCN has been issued in error, please accept our apologies for this and any undue stress caused, we have cancelled the PCN and redacted your details.
 
 
Kind Regards”

In response to this and to have a bit of fun with Bank we have responded as follows;-

“Thank you for your email of 17 October.

I would like to set out the series of events and correspondence that you have completely unnecessarily created for me, as a direct result of your incompetence.
You sought, without cause, to obtain the RK details for the vehicle from DVLA, as parking had already been prepaid.
You contacted the RK, a hire company, who provided my details and charged me an admin fee for having done so.
You then issued a PCN to me on 25/7/25. I should also point out that this Notice is not compliant with Sch 4 PoFA 2012 as it did not enclose any of the documents referred to in the Notice, providing further evidence of your incompetence.
I then lodged a complaint with you, which your private parking sector single code of practice says should also, where appropriate, be treated as an appeal.
Your response was to direct me to use your appeal process which was completely unnecessary and both a further waste of my time together with providing now mounting evidence of your collective incompetence.
So despite holding an unresolved complaint/appeal you then issued a final reminder dated 8/8/25.
On 18 August, as I had no confidence of your ability to link the already existing complaint with the relevant PCN, I did then, in desperation complete the online appeal form and try to link it to the previous complaint.
On 3/9/25 I had to issue a follow up, via your online contact form, as my complaint was still unresolved.
You provide a mindless response on 3/9/25, and I replied to you on the same date, reminding you of what had happened previously as you were clearly too stupid to make the link on your own.
On 10/9/25 you provided a response from your appeals department to confirm that the PCN had been cancelled. There has never been a proper response to my complaint, presumably because you don’t have anyone with the required intelligence to write one.
On 26/9/25 you then, with unsurprising stupidity, issued a Notice of Debt Collection for the previously cancelled PCN.
On 1/10/25 I issued an email FTAO the Data Protection Officer which constituted a valid Subject Access Request.
Your email response of 17/10/25 confirmed that the PCN was issued in error and apologised for any undue stress caused.

Please note that your email of 17/10/25 does not constitute a reply to what was a valid Subject Access Request, which remains outstanding with an initial timescale still running and which expires on 31 October 2025.

In an attempt to finally bring this to a conclusion I am now giving you the opportunity to provide me with compensation, both for the actual admin fee that I incurred and for the undue stress that you identified having caused me.

This whole process was completely unnecessary, had you have acted with proper due diligence and identified that I had prepaid for the parking for which you then incorrectly issued the PCN.

Dealing with you has been both stressful and enormously frustrating, due very much to your collective incompetence. I have spent a number of hours researching this process and identifying where you couldn’t be bothered to follow it correctly.

I require you to pay £70 in compensation to bring this matter to a conclusion. Please note this is not a negotiation, it is simply an opportunity for you to conclude the matter while limiting your direct and opportunity costs. Once confirmed, I will provide my details to you to enable you to make payment.

If you fail to respond with the next 14 days or do so without providing agreement to the proposed settlement figure, I will;-
Require a full response to the valid Subject Access Request, failure to do so will result in a complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office.
Require a proper response to the issues set out in my formal complaint. If you fail to do so I will report this matter to the BPA.
Require a full explanation by what is meant by “redacted your details”.
Be making a complaint to DVLA about misuse of your KADOE contract as you did not have reasonable cause to begin this process, had you have taken the necessary care to check that I had already prepaid.
Be complaining to my MP to get them involved post consultation and as further evidence of why this cowboy industry needs proper independent regulation.
Be Registering a claim with the Small Claims Court for my direct costs and any resulting fees to bring the case to the court.

Re: Bank Parking - compensation for ticket being issued incorrectly.
« Reply #16 on: »
Good update. A few targeted points to tighten the strategy and maximise prospects if you've not actually sent that to Bank...

This is actionable advice, focused and from your position as the Hirer...

1. Legal basis to rely on
Bring a claim under the Data Protection Act 2018, relying on UK GDPR Articles 5(1)(a) and 6(1)(f). Their first breach of your GDPR rights started when they first received and used your personal data from the leasing company without reasonable cause, then continued with the NtH and later chasing. Cite the missed SAR deadline as a separate breach of Articles 12(3) and 15. PoFA non-compliance and the fact the driver is unidentified are context showing you were never liable.

2. Tighten the ask and quantum
Stop offering £70. Demand £210 total now: £10 material loss (hire admin fee) plus £200 distress. Add s.69 County Courts Act interest if you issue. Keep a single figure; do not invite negotiation.

3. What to keep from your draft
Keep the chronology, the prepayment fact, the dates of PCN, NtH, “final reminder”, debt letter, the cancellation and apology, and the SAR date and deadline. Keep the point that they sought keeper data when there was no breach to investigate. Keep that their NtH was not PoFA compliant and the driver has not been identified.

4. What to change in your draft (if not too late)
Strip all insults. Replace “incompetence” language with “no reasonable cause” and “no lawful basis under UK GDPR”. Insert the legal hook: DPA 2018 s.168 and UK GDPR Articles 5(1)(a), 6(1)(f), plus 12(3) and 15 for the SAR breach. State that settlement will not affect their duty to comply with the SAR. Give a clear 14-day deadline and say you will issue a claim on day 15.

5. Immediate actions (do these now, in parallel)
• ICO: lodge a complaint today for missed SAR deadline. Attach the SAR, their 17 Oct apology, and your chronology.

• DVLA: You’re reporting operator (Bank Parking) misuse of DVLA keeper data (no “reasonable cause”) under Reg. 27/KADOE. DVLA can investigate KADOE abuse regardless of who reports it.
Your standing: you’re the affected Hirer. DVLA’s release to the RK triggered downstream processing of your data and a £10 charge. That gives you a legitimate interest to report suspected misuse.
How to frame the complaint. Say: “I’m the hirer affected by PCN [ref] for VRM [VRM]. Bank accessed DVLA keeper data on [date] without reasonable cause because parking was prepaid. They later admitted the PCN was ‘issued in error’ and cancelled.”
Attach: prepayment proof, Bank’s cancellation/apology, the NtH, the hire firm’s £10 invoice, timeline.
Ask DVLA to: audit Bank’s ‘reasonable cause’ for that enquiry and take compliance action under KADOE.

• Erasure/restriction: Send an Article 17/18 notice to Bank requiring erasure/suppression of your personal data for this PCN unless they can evidence a lawful basis to retain; demand confirmation in 14 days.

• Leasing company: optionally ask for a goodwill refund of the £10 due to misdescription (“motoring offences/fines”) and the operator’s admitted error. If they refund, you will reduce the Bank claim to distress only to avoid double recovery.

6. Evidence pack to finalise before issue
• Prepayment proof for the VRM and date.
• PCN, NtH, final reminder, debt letter.
• Cancellation email and the apology admitting “issued in error”.
• Hire company invoice for £10 and proof you owe/paid it.
• Your SAR email and one chaser.

When they finally respond to the SAR: DVLA request/response timestamps, payment/VRM logs, internal audit trail, lawful basis record, and the recorded cancellation reason.

7. Anticipate their defence and your reply
They will plead legitimate interests and honest mistake. Your reply: no reasonable cause at the outset because a basic check of their own systems would have confirmed a valid pre-paid session; legitimate interests fails where necessity and proportionality are missing. Continued processing and a debt letter after cancellation aggravate the breach.

8. If no payment in 14 days
Issue a small claim against Bank for £210 plus interest and fee. Keep particulars short: prepaid parking; unlawful DVLA trigger; your personal data obtained from the leasing company; NtH despite no breach; cancellation and apology; missed SAR deadline; damages under DPA 2018 s.168.

That’s it. Keep it clean, legal, quantified, and on a 14-day clock.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Bank Parking - compensation for ticket being issued incorrectly.
« Reply #17 on: »
Thank you for some great advice there.

I’ll start on those next week once I have the opportunity to put some more time into it.

The email has been sent to Bank but the 14 day deadline to respond expires Tuesday (5/11) so it will be all systems go once we get past that point.

Lots to do but don’t want to miss the chance to hit back at one of these cowboys.

Re: Bank Parking - compensation for ticket being issued incorrectly.
« Reply #18 on: »
Bank have unsurprisingly gone very quiet. Nothing further from them at all.

DVLA complaint made and now acknowledged with the following response of 13/11/25 -
“Good afternoon,
 
Thank you for your recent correspondence.
 
I am currently investigating this matter with the parking company concerned and as soon as this has been completed, I will respond to your complaint.”

Not sure how long this will take but at least a step forward.

Complaint made to ICO but their website says that it will currently be 29 weeks before it is allocated to an investigator. So their ability to enforce the failure to respond by Bank is basically nil and I wonder why we continue to waste taxpayer funding on such an abysmal organisation. This mirrors previous experience with them that ended with me complaining about the ICO themselves and their completely pointless existence.

I’ve registered a complaint with IPC that their member company hasn’t followed their sector code of practice in failing to respond to a legitimate complaint. I’m not hopeful that this bunch will do anything but I promised Bank that a complaint would be made, so don’t want to let them down.

My friend has decided that we aren’t going to push back against the hire company but is happy to go via the small claims route against Bank so that seems to be the final issue to get underway now.
Like Like x 1 View List