For heavens sake... a telephone conversation is not worth the paper it isn't written on! You must get everything in writing. You should email them and demand that they provide a copy of the email they say they sent on 9/12/24 and to include all the headers in order to prove that it was sent and to the correct email address.
In fact, just SAR Horizon. In the SAR point out that a simple copy of any email they claim to have sent to you must include the headers as evidence of having been sent.
Is this true or are you simply paraphrasing?
"She stated that it is a PoFA account and I have to name a driver. She said there is nothing I can do but speak to the enforcement agents at this point".
Their NtK is definitely NOT PoFA compliant and there is absolutely NO legal obligation on the Keeper to name the driver. I certainly hope you didn't blab the drivers identity by saying things like "I did this or that" instead of "The driver did this or that".
And have you checked your junk folder as advised a while ago?
I did check my junk folder and this is there reply to my email.. apparently I must of made a typo when appealing
Thank you for your email.
Please be advised the email above does not match with the email on the appeals form.
For your own data protection, please understand that we can only correspond with the driver or registered keeper of a vehicle concerned with a Parking Charge.
If it assists you, we can accept correspondence from a third party on behalf of the driver or registered keeper, but only when prior written authorisation has been provided by the driver or registered keeper of the vehicle concerned. This can be handwritten and sent to us as a PDF or an image.
If you were the driver of the vehicle at the time, please confirm your full name and full postal address and we can then respond to your query.