Author Topic: Court summons  (Read 872 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Court summons
« Reply #15 on: »
Your WS covers Jopson v Homeguard, and other cases, and it seems to me that this is important. If it comes to court you could also expand on the fact you were explicitly given permission to stop. Other than that, you have the risk of judge lottery on the day, but if I were in your shoes I’d take that risk.

Re: Court summons
« Reply #16 on: »
So far as I can see, the fact that the car park was gated and the driver had no means of access will destroy the claimant's position - the only way the driver could access the site was when the caretaker gave specific permission and opened the gate - it is quite reasonable that the driver assumed that this was all the permission which was required in the circumstances.

The parking operator will need to show that the defendant entered a contract with them.

In order to demonstrate contract the Claimant will need to show that the driver 'intended to form a legal relationship' with the Claimant - why would the driver intend to form such a contract when they already had permission to use the car park.

The Jopson v Homeguard evidence will add further to the Claimant's woes.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2026, 12:56:06 pm by InterCity125 »